Program listings include a potentially high-pressure sales technique, e.g., "This Fee Structure is subsidized by 65% as scholarship and is subject to availability of number of places. Therefore you can take advantage of this subsidy of 65% of the original Program Fee by applying as early as possible. Limited Seats." Swiss School of Management DBA Not new. Swiss cantonal + DEAC. LIUTEBM University, Zambia (Livingstone International University of Tourism Excellence and Business Management) PhD An institutional name highly focused by subject but PhDs in everything under the sun including engineering, health sciences, psychology, and "Any other relevant area (subject to review)." IIC University of Technology, Cambodia PhD, DBA, DCS For the PhD and DBA, "International Admissions are not open for this […] program, at present." For the DCS, a "Page not found" error. IU International University of Applied Sciences, Germany MBA Not new, and another "Page not found" error.
That is an interesting point. Although, I imagine that they appoint a supervisor with the relevant expertise. In any event, it looks as though this institution has accreditation through Zambia's Higher Education Authority. Also, you missed one.
Ah, now via the Research Programs menu option, I see B.T. University, India and also longtime DegreeInfo topic Azteca University, Mexico.
I've actually been in contact with GradXs. They've been trying to get me to schedule an appointment and enroll. I had been thinking about their post-doc programs from Azteca but I am busy enough with ENEB, about to start on my Adult Ed graduate certificate, and doing a training program in media buying alongside working my new job as an Adult Education Instructor with another contract job from an online school. These are best for life-long learning that is low cost with practically full recognition from foreign schools although some are likely considered as equivalent to peer accredited here in the US. If you need a degree, I wouldn't enroll in any of their programs and would stick with local schools with an assistantship, scholarship, or some type of reimbursement. If you are a perpetual student, I would say go for it.
Just wondering here but what evidence do you have that these institutions are "accreditation-adjacent"?
Rich used the term "accrediation-adjacent" and I used the term "peer accredited". Essentially these are institutions that have relationships with programmatic, institutional, or state-recognized accreditors that validate their institution's degrees without actually being accredited or recognized themselves. Very similar to a propio degree.
As with all such things, the proof is in the pudding. When AACRAO was the main body for making these kinds of determinations for colleges and universities, we knew what criteria they employed. John Bear, borrowing from the accounting profession, promoted the idea of "GAAP," "Generally Accepted Accrediting Principles." (As John says, he didn't coin the usage, but he did use it.) If a foreign school met one of six criteria, it was generally considered comparable to being accredited in the U.S.* The school, not individual programs. Under that system, proprio degrees from otherwise-recognized schools would be accepted. Under that system, these schools that hold canon/state/private accreditation would not. But AACRAO got out of the foreign credential evaluation business. Later, foreign credential evaluation services stepped in, and that's what we have today. One goes to a university to get both an education and a degree. That degree--serving as a proxy for its holder--has to do its job by being recognized as legitimate. So, the question continues to be, will a degree from these (or other) "accreditation adjacent" schools or programs suffice here in the U.S.? We know that when degrees from them are evaluated successfully as equivalent to accreditation here in the U.S. by a foreign credential evaluator that is, in turn, acceptable to whomever is making a decision about the acceptability of one's credential, they usually are. Then there is the question of the country and its higher education system. Even if a school's degrees are evaluated successfully, are we to expect degrees from schools no one's ever heard of from obscure (in the U.S.) educational systems in far away countries going to work? Cambodia, Zambia, Malta, etc.? A much tougher question to answer before enrolling. * Did you know that the Monterrey Institute for Graduate Studies met the criteria for GAAP? Yup. Under the listing for the CEU in the International Handbook for Universities, MIGS was specifically included at one time. Today, such a set up would be considered proprio at best.
Why settle for questionable providers? In today's world, there are many fully accredited and reputable institutions offering online and flexible degree programs. Choosing a recognized provider usually ensures you receive a quality education and the credentials you deserve.
Some want to put a check in the box in the easiest, least expensive, and most flexible ways possible. One should definitely go for golden standard accredited programs if they can. However, silver and bronze (partially recognized or legally authorized) programs are still a valid option for those in the private sector or for life-long learning as a whole provided they are reputable and not a diploma mill.
I have never seen any evidence of this. I've never seen anyone apply a sliding scale to acceptability based on accreditation status. Either people know what they're looking at or they do not. The acceptability of these unaccredited (or equivalent) degrees is entirely based on people not knowing what they're looking at. So, what's the difference between getting one of these and just purchasing a diploma? Well, for one, these degrees are much less likely to cause embarassment after-the-fact. As John Bear used to say, putting a diploma mill degree on your resume is like putting a ticking time bomb there; you never know when it will go off. I don't think that's the case with degrees from these sources. Another: you can and will do actual academic work to earn these degrees. This can be as important to your career as the degree.* But.... Why do it? I'll quote the post above: And I can't tell you how much I disagree with this thinking. (*In my case, the PhD I earned first was explosive to my career because of the degree itself; no one ever cared about what I studied and found. And with the second doctorate, no one has ever cared that I even have it, but the work I did was vital to advancing my practice in a direction I truly needed. )
