I don’t doubt it that you can write. It is truth that seems to give you difficulty. Moreover, who is to be held in lower esteem, the person who cannot write well or the person who can but does not? I guess you're just not clear on the concept. This isn’t a private message to me; the whole world is watching. Uh huh. Sure. We all know that legal files are always truthful and perfectly written, and that judges never make mistakes. You can’t be serious. You need help, Wes, serious help. The only person resorting to personal attacks on this thread is you. It’s all here for the world to see. No you won’t; you’re either too freaking lazy or you don’t have the skills. You never research anything you post here, so why this? You are making an assertion, then stating that you might research it (isn’t that kind of backwards?) as if doing so is sufficient corroboration for your statement. It isn’t. Yep. Just as anyone can reread this post from the beginning and see you were the only one to post false information and then resort to personal attacks when others called you on it. Do you mean to say you don’t know who I am? How can you post all the allegations you have made if you don’t know? Are you now admitting that (just like all your other posts on this forum) you don’t have a clue what you are talking about? I believe that you have just admitted that your allegations are false and not based on any evidence whatsoever. I would’ve thought that you had already been sufficiently embarrassed by all the drivel you posted concerning anonymity. No. The popular consensus was that language skills are indeed relevant when an individual is touting the quality of his or her education as you are. However, reread my post. Language wasn’t my concern; truthfulness, ethics, research methods, and logic were. Still incapable of doing any research, Wes?