What was tracs original website address?

If TRACS did post briefly that LBU, under its previous name, was fully accredited, that would be notable. If this is instead a distance education Mandela effect, that's at least mildly amusing! (What other events could be the subject of a distance education Mandela effect?)

 

Are you talking to me? I found the tracs old website from an email I found that listed that domain. I am not sure what you're going on about. You didn't disprove anything, you started with the claim they never were an applicant. Btw that data base list schools that have have achieved candidate statues as well....yet it's not there still. Does that prove they never were a candidate? Of course not, we know they were.

I am looking for tracs information not lbu, but that was one school I was curious about of many. So you are conflating two things as one.

Is this a sore subject for you for some reason? You're first few posts on this subject were they never had tracs or applied to deac. I am merely looking for an old website address. Why are you talking to me this way? No one is making you respond.

Btw they are not choosing to remain unaccredited, they have tried three times and failed all three... As well as them looking into a validation scheme.

I truly don't understand your open hostility towards me.

 

It would be notable if it did happen. That's why I am looking for tracs old website. Also, they denied even have them listed as a candidate school. I asked for a full list of all applicants and they left a lot of

 

I really don't think Johann was expressing any animosity or problem with you. In this day and age, unaccredited institutions generally deserve little respect. Perhaps you are interpreting suspicion or disrespect of an unaccredited institution as somehow being directed at you?

 

He basically called me a liar. Saying he disproved stuff and then claimed I was making stuff up. Sadly he apparently didn't read what I said and badly missed the mark. The email address was a person with tracs that had a different website address attached, nothing with LBU.

No disrespect Bill, but he was totally disrespectful to me.

 

Google:

The Mandela effect occurs when a person believes that their distorted memories are, in fact, accurate recollections. They can clearly remember events that happened differently or events that never occurred at all. The Mandela effect does not involve lying or deception.

Thank you, Jonathan. 'Nuff said.

 

What is your problem? Who is lying here?

 

As far as I know, nobody. Your problem is, that you think somebody must be lying.

I think I did. Starting with that "Name it and Frame it" business. I proved that It was never written there that LBU had TRACS accreditation, as you alleged. I cited others' posts to the contrary. Jonathan contributed additional info. He searched DAPIP and found that TRACS accreditation is not shown as having been cancelled for LBU. I take that as further confirmation that full TRACS accreditation of LBU never existed. There was additional anecdotal evidence to support this conclusion by knowledgeable posters - but I'm not claiming that as proof
.

I did no such thing. A person is not lying when they say something they really believe to be true.. Delusional or obsessed, possibly - but not lying. Jonathan's "Mandela effect" would seem to apply here. It just seemed difficult or impossible for you to give up on your mistaken belief.

Jonathan Whatley searched DAPIP and found that TRACS accreditation is not shown as having been cancelled for LBU. I take that as further confirmation that full TRACS accreditation of LBU never existed. There was additional anecdotal evidence to support this conclusion by knowledgeable posters - but I'm not claiming that as proof.

I have no patience with erroneous information. That is what made me respond.

I apologize - for getting involved in a dispute about a religious school. I have no place in that arena. You won't hear from me on that subject again. That's the best I can do.

I'll try not to read any further posts by you. I seem to remember doing this with you once, a long time ago, over something else. That should solve the problem.

 

Once more you are creating straw men to argue with. You didn't even know they were in the book (of which I have a copy) I never said they were accredited in that one post, I said got tracs, as in the candidate status. You are acting as if you did anything and you look foolish. You are mixing stuff I said up, twisting other things, and then acting as if you figured it out. I told you it was in the book lol.

You made several misrepresentations about what I said and now will disappear and pretend you were right. Thats is absurd. You clearly wanted to make up any reason to disrespect me and argue. Even if that meant you were going to lie to do it. Dishonest.

 

I'm shaking my head here. As someone well-known on DI says "And that's enough of that." Enough for me, anyway. No point in rebuttal, G'night.

 

This is completely dishonest of you right here. I can do this to almost every point you made. You are way out of line on this one.

 

I know Johann and dishonest he is not. I apologize for getting involved. I thought I could help but I seemed to have triggered you more. Sorry again.

 

You literally ignored my post directly above yours showing him lying about what I said. Literal proof.

You said he's not talking about you and he clarified he was in fact talking about me. How was you ignoring what was happening and defending your friend helping me? Gaslight much?

 

This discussion didn't need to become heated nor personal.

 

Agreed and most unfortunate.