It seems as though lack of recognition may well be the only downfall for some unaccredited schools. As far as academically strenuous programs, some (though not many) unaccredited schools beat many accredited schools. If they don't beat them, at least they match them. I really do not understand why more employers do not take each school listed on a resume on a case by case basis (except for the headache that might ensue). Educational method is too subjective, and learning styles are too diverse to have too stringent a set of rules by which to accept or reject schools off hand. What do you think?