Warning: Another Mill

Discussion in 'General Distance Learning Discussions' started by LGFlood, Jun 26, 2013.

Loading...
  1. SAVIGNE

    SAVIGNE member

    Excuse me, but Fortunately i have legal transcripts !!

    -----------------------------------

    Gérard SAVIGNÉ, ThD
     
  2. SAVIGNE

    SAVIGNE member

    I have transcripts for Missionary Chapel and Seminary. This is a very good school for the Faith.

    --------------------------------------

    Gérard SAVIGNÉ, ThD
     
  3. SurfDoctor

    SurfDoctor Moderator


    Hmmm, this looks like someone from the degree mill itself. We will ban anyone who is acting as a shill for a degree mill...and by the way, we are not the Congress.
     
  4. curtisc83

    curtisc83 New Member

    Incorporated does not mean accredited. Legal isn't a good term to use when trying to prove your "degree" is real. In my home state of Texas it would actually be very illegal to use your "legal" degree, a Class B misdemeanor in fact. I'm sure other states have similar laws.


    The Texas Penal Code (Section 32.52) prohibits the use of fraudulent or substandard degrees "in a written or oral advertisement or other promotion of a business; or with the intent to: obtain employment; obtain a license or certificate to practice a trade, profession, or occupation; obtain a promotion, a compensation or other benefit, or an increase in compensation or other benefit, in employment or in the practice of a trade, profession, or occupation; obtain admission to an educational program in this state; or gain a position in government with authority over another person, regardless of whether the actor receives compensation for the position." Violation of this law is a Class B misdemeanor.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 26, 2014
  5. jumbodog

    jumbodog New Member

    IANAL but ever since the Supreme Court struck down the Stolen Valor act I've felt that these types of laws are of dubious constitutionality. The court has made it clear that it doesn't like laws that seek to ban lying and that's exactly what these laws seem to do. The regulation of a word like "psychology" can be spun as a restriction on commercial speech or to prevent a type of fraud but in the Texas code commerce or fraud isn't necessary to violate the law. Just from an observers point of view I'd think it would be fun to see some litigation.
     
  6. CalDog

    CalDog New Member

    There was a well-known lawsuit a few years ago between the State of Oregon and the unaccredited Kennedy-Western University over this issue. At the time, KWU operated legally under state license in Wyoming, but their degrees (and those of other unaccredited schools) were banned in Oregon. KWU argued that their unaccredited degrees were issued legally, and that their grads had a free-speech right to advertise them in Oregon.

    The case was ultimately settled out of court. Oregon acknowledged that yes, KWU degree holders did have a right to advertise their degrees. However, Oregon immediately instituted a "disclaimer" rule: since unaccredited degrees do not meet Oregon's legal standards, such degrees can only be advertised in Oregon with a legal disclaimer attached:

    KWU did not attempt to challenge the Oregon "disclaimer" rule, and it still appears to be in effect.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 27, 2014
  7. CalDog

    CalDog New Member

    The exact wording of Oregon's legally required disclaimer on unaccredited degrees is as follows:

    Oregon does have a process by which unaccredited schools can seek state approval. If a school is unaccredited, but has Oregon approval, then its degrees can be used in Oregon without the disclaimer.
     
  8. SteveFoerster

    SteveFoerster Resident Gadfly Staff Member

    Indeed. Interestingly, while both were free speech issues, they were sort of opposite sides of a coin in that the Stolen Valor Act decision was about the right to lie, whereas the previous ban in Oregon was about being forbidden from telling the truth.

    As for the disclaimer, it probably still is on the books awaiting some eventual challenge. With Contreras long gone, however, I wonder whether ODA pursues these things with the same vehemence, and kind of doubt it.
     
  9. SAVIGNE

    SAVIGNE member

    Don't juge


    Matthew 7

    Complete Jewish Bible (CJB)

    7 “Don’t judge, so that you won’t be judged. 2 For the way you judge others is how you will be judged — the measure with which you measure out will be used to measure to you. 3 Why do you see the splinter in your brother’s eye but not notice the log in your own eye? 4 How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the splinter out of your eye,’ when you have the log in your own eye? 5 You hypocrite! First, take the log out of your own eye; then you will see clearly, so that you can remove the splinter from your brother’s eye!

    6 “Don’t give to dogs what is holy, and don’t throw your pearls to the pigs. If you do, they may trample them under their feet, then turn and attack you.

    7 “Keep asking, and it will be given to you; keep seeking, and you will find; keep knocking, and the door will be opened to you. 8 For everyone who keeps asking receives; he who keeps seeking finds; and to him who keeps knocking, the door will be opened. 9 Is there anyone here who, if his son asks him for a loaf of bread, will give him a stone? 10 or if he asks for a fish, will give him a snake? 11 So if you, even though you are bad, know how to give your children gifts that are good, how much more will your Father in heaven keep giving good things to those who keep asking him!

    12 “Always treat others as you would like them to treat you; that sums up the teaching of the Torah and the Prophets.

    13 “Go in through the narrow gate; for the gate that leads to destruction is wide and the road broad, and many travel it; 14 but it is a narrow gate and a hard road that leads to life, and only a few find it.

    15 “Beware of the false prophets! They come to you wearing sheep’s clothing, but underneath they are hungry wolves! 16 You will recognize them by their fruit. Can people pick grapes from thorn bushes, or figs from thistles? 17 Likewise, every healthy tree produces good fruit, but a poor tree produces bad fruit. 18 A healthy tree cannot bear bad fruit, or a poor tree good fruit. 19 Any tree that does not produce good fruit is cut down and thrown in the fire! 20 So you will recognize them by their fruit.

    21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord!’ will enter the Kingdom of Heaven, only those who do what my Father in heaven wants. 22 On that Day, many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord! Didn’t we prophesy in your name? Didn’t we expel demons in your name? Didn’t we perform many miracles in your name?’ 23 Then I will tell them to their faces, ‘I never knew you! Get away from me, you workers of lawlessness!’[a]

    24 “So, everyone who hears these words of mine and acts on them will be like a sensible man who built his house on bedrock. 25 The rain fell, the rivers flooded, the winds blew and beat against that house, but it didn’t collapse, because its foundation was on rock. 26 But everyone who hears these words of mine and does not act on them will be like a stupid man who built his house on sand. 27 The rain fell, the rivers flooded, the wind blew and beat against that house, and it collapsed — and its collapse was horrendous!”

    28 When Yeshua had finished saying these things, the crowds were amazed at the way he taught, 29 for he was not instructing them like their Torah-teachers but as one who had authority himself.


    Footnotes:
    a.Matthew 7:23 Psalm 6:9(8)

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Gérard SAVIGNÉ, ThD
     
  10. SAVIGNE

    SAVIGNE member

    Do not judge

    Matthew 7:1

    "Do not judge so that you will not be judged.''

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Gérard SAVIGNÉ, ThD
     
  11. PilgrimPastor

    PilgrimPastor New Member

    $99! I'm saving up! lol
     
  12. SAVIGNE

    SAVIGNE member

    It is not so expensive for a gift

    Romans 5:15

    ''But the gift is not like the trespass. For if the many died by the trespass of the one man, how much more did God's grace and the gift that came by the grace of the one man, Jesus Christ, overflow to the many!''

    -------------------------

    Gérard SAVIGNÉ, ThD
     
  13. jumbodog

    jumbodog New Member

    That's one way to think about the difference between the two laws. Another way would be to view the SVA as an attempt to regulate a lie of commission whereas the OR law is an attempt to regulate a lie of omission (what is being omitted is that the degree is unaccredited.) I'm not sure that such a distinction makes any difference Constitutionally because the Supreme Court has said that part of the First Amendment guarantee of freedom is speech is that the government can't compel speech--with the OR law one is being compelled to tell the whole truth. If the government can't ban ordinary lying then it doesn't seem like it can compel the truth in ordinary circumstances, either, as they seem two sides of the same coin.
     
  14. CalDog

    CalDog New Member

    I am not a lawyer, but my guess is that the degree disclaimer would survive a legal challenge, because it is consistent with long-established practices for the use of another type of credential: the professional license.

    The fundamental issue here is that states have different standards for degrees; this means that a degree legally issued in State A may not meet the standards of State B. In practice, most degrees are unaffected by this issue, because they have some form of USDoE-recognized accreditation, which is accepted everywhere. The issue does, however, affect unaccredited degrees.

    And the exact same issue routinely affects state professional licenses. For example, a CPA license issued in State A will not normally be valid for use in State B.

    So if you move to State B, can you still advertise your professional license from State A -- which is invalid in State B? Yes, you have the right to speak truthfully about out-of-state licenses. But if you are not licensed to practice in State B, then State B will also expect you to speak truthfully about that fact as well. This disclosure is normally made in the form of a disclaimer. The Oregon degree disclaimer rule is the same solution to the same issue.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 27, 2014
  15. SteveFoerster

    SteveFoerster Resident Gadfly Staff Member

    That's an interesting point. The problem is that if one keeps going along this path, then why just institutional accreditation status? Why not whether a business program has AACSB? Why not whether a degree was earned through correspondence study, online, in the classroom, or some combination? Why not whether the student transferred in more than a certain percentage of credit? Why not whether the student spent a semester abroad?

    The list is endless, and one might argue that institutional accreditation is the most important of these, and I would probably even agree, but since checking whether a school in the U.S. is accredited by a recognized agency is trivially easy, this seems like an unnecessary intrusion.

    The U.S. government at all levels compels and forbids all sorts of speech, particularly in the commercial sphere. I don't think one should make a confident prediction of how courts would rule on this based on the SVA case.
     
  16. CalDog

    CalDog New Member

    But if no one is going any further along the path, then is there an actual problem? Oregon state law, for example, only covers institutional accreditation status. And it's been that way for years. To my knowledge, neither Oregon nor any other state has expressed any interest in mandating further disclosures.

    Because the state law of Oregon (and as far as I know, every other state) is completely silent on these distinctions. And no one (as far as I can tell) has any interest in amending the law to add those distinctions. That's why not.

    It's also very easy to check professional licenses -- in fact, the licensure system is even more detailed, because you can verify the status of individuals, not just schools.

    But it's still a crime to misrepresent your licensure status. Suppose I misrepresent myself as an attorney. It's not a defense to state: "Well, no one should have been fooled, because it's trivially easy to verify bar membership at www.calbar.ca.gov".
     
  17. PilgrimPastor

    PilgrimPastor New Member

    You are transcripts??? :blackeye:
     
  18. SAVIGNE

    SAVIGNE member

    Yes, i am transcripts, because i am not jealous others, as on this forum !! i worked with faith in Jesus Christ.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Gérard SAVIGNÉ, ThD
     
  19. SAVIGNE

    SAVIGNE member

    To have faith in Jesus Christ means to trust Him and obey His commandments. Faith is much more than passive belief.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Gérard SAVIGNÉ, ThD
     
  20. SAVIGNE

    SAVIGNE member

    Faith in Jesus Christ

    To have faith in Jesus Christ means to trust Him and obey His commandments. Faith is much more than passive belief.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Gérard SAVIGNÉ, ThD
     

Share This Page