So I avoid the political portion of this forum because I refuse to read all of the negativity that takes place in this part of the forum. However, I did want to say how refreshing it was to see a quality, respectful debate. Vance and Walz were both well-spoken and showed a mutual respect to one another. This is how political debates should be.
Honestly, I was surprised with Walz. As for JD Vance, I have seen his interviews many times and with his legal and Goverment professionals; it is no surprise there.
I am not one to fact check everything they say. I just enjoyed seeing a debate where those debating were not name calling, talking over one another, etc.