Ph.D. in Applied Social Justice - Online

Discussion in 'General Distance Learning Discussions' started by chrisjm18, Aug 4, 2022.

Loading...
  1. Rich Douglas

    Rich Douglas Well-Known Member

    I note that all three of these pair evoke CRT, but they're actually Ethnic Studies majors. Ethnic Studies, of course, has long been recognized as a major area of study. Looking at the content of the first cited example, CRT makes up 3 s.h. of the 120-s.h. curriculum. CRT is being used like a keyword on a website.

    But I do know this: if there is a stand-alone CRT major, you'll ferret it out. That's why I posed my comment as a question, anticipating you might show that I'm wrong. But in this case, I'm not seeing it. It looks "bolted on" because it's a hot topic.
     
  2. nosborne48

    nosborne48 Well-Known Member

    But there's that word "applied".
     
  3. Rich Douglas

    Rich Douglas Well-Known Member

    Could you explain this further? Thanks.
     
  4. Alpine

    Alpine Active Member

    You asked a good question! I agree it looks “bolted on” apparently to the social sciences. Perhaps the word “major” has taken on a new definition in academics. Concentration, specialization, emphasis, focus and major seem to all blend together nowadays. There is also the “catch phrase” that helps market a program. As far as me “ferreting it out,” It’s not that important to me. I only have so much time on this earth and appreciate knowledge that has utility and ROI.
     
    Last edited: Sep 19, 2022
  5. nosborne48

    nosborne48 Well-Known Member

    Only what you said earlier.
     
  6. Neuhaus

    Neuhaus Well-Known Member

    Considering we are seeing people with DBAs working in academia with seemingly no harm to their careers I suspect it is, indeed, a distinction without a difference in many (but probably not all) cases.

    From a private sector standpoint, I can tell you that in 90% of the cases an MSM is likely to be considered equivalent (as in "MBA or equivalent required") to an MBA. It starts to get a bit sketchy when you start trying to sub out an M.Ed. in Educational Leadership for an MBA, however. If I were a gambling man, I would suspect a person more likely to run into problems when they start stretching into blurrier lined boundaries.

    For example, we all know that you can enter a PhD program in, say, sociology and focus your research on a topic like penology. You can also focus your research on penology while in a CJ program. And depending on your focus maybe you even pull off that penology focus in a program in psychology, education or even business. Again, it really depends on what your research interest within that field looks like. The stretchier that leap looks, though, the more problems it may cause. A DBA thesis that focuses on the business of private prisons, for example, may add well to the intellectual and academic conversation around modern penology. Will that person be able to land a spot on CJ faculty because of that? Ehh...maybe? Depends on what they're looking for, I suppose. But that DBA is probably going to hurt more than help in that specific scenario.

    It is, therefore, important to consider what you want to study and what specifically you hope to do with that information once you study it. In the case of you, Rich, I doubt anyone is sitting there really contemplating the nuances of what post-nominals to which you are entitled. It's your research that furthers the conversation. The specific wording of the diploma (or what WES thinks of it) is of little consequence to most of the people you encounter. I suspect it would be the same for many others. But alas, too often in these conversations we get caught up in how great the wording would look on a resume or LinkedIn page to the detriment of the research or the applied project.
     
    Rich Douglas likes this.
  7. Rich Douglas

    Rich Douglas Well-Known Member

    That's the point. It might not matter at all ever to some people. And it might be a tripping point to others.

    The DBA is interesting in that a lot of the schools we come across offering it really make the distinction between it and the PhD exactly as I've described it, yet readers here are quick to rush past that distinction. I'm not making it up nor trying to convince people to come along. It's right there.

    (Around 35 years ago I inquired at UNISA regarding admission to their doctorate-level business program. (If memory serves, it was a doctor of commerce.) They said very clearly that an MA or MS in Business would be acceptable for admission, but an MBA would not. They made the same distinction at the master's-level I'm talking about here.)

    I have no way of measuring this, but I suspect this issue will become even more acute as the DBA flourishes.
     

Share This Page