Bill Dayson: I'm supposing that you did not see my question to you at the end of Janko's Apology. So, I'll ask it again. In your post in that thread I understand you to infer that I repeatedly employed these following methods in my recent discussions about the Bible and/or Christian Theology: 1) I drop the names of scholars just to dismiss another's arguments instead of responding to those arguments. 2) I dismiss secondary sources just because they are not primary sources. 3) I reject the writings of ancient and medieval theologians just because they are not modern. Here is my question: If you do not apply these criticisms to me, would you please say that? If you do , would be so kind , please, as to provide your evidence that I practiced these three methods in recent Bible/Theology discussions which, I agree, are not sound argumentation. If I do, I should be ashamed of myself. If I do practice these, then, I here will make my public apology to the one ( s) I so mistreated. I think it very wrong to use such avoidances! We should provide evidence regardless of what subject OR WHOM we make claims about. So please, if it is your claim that I practice these three methods when discussing Bible/Theology , then provide your evidence for that claim. Name the thread (s) and explain the context and content where I did this. I need that correction if I deserve it. Thanks,