not all accreditations are equal

tired...

It's tiring answering your own letters.

Me we tink i get some Seborga cusinie.

Is needing nap. Bye.

 

Whatever.... Azad.... Lerner..... BadenSpellerman.... sheez.....

I is rasist Amerikanski peeg..... yes..... Lutheran too, like Janko....

 

Perfect way to try and make this post unreadable ha?

what is your problem you have problem to admit that your degree
is not Professionally accredited and that makes it not on the same level as PA + RA degree.

Yes, the tactics to change the topic.

readers listen to what the Head Learner have to say, you are looking for a degree - that can be applied and have higher respect in USA or the rest of the world than find a program that offers RA + PA.

If based on DL restrictions you get only RA then make it sure the schools has good name recognition.

If that is not possible then settle for B&M school that offers DL degrees.

And as a last resort go for completely DL school that is RA.

Then if not possible check for good NA school.

Obviusly there are good GAAP - international schools, in USA
local US schools have advantage over oversees schools.
When compare apple to apples.



Head Learner

 

(sings) "...in the Navy..."

 

I'm sure I'm learning something when I read this thread, but exactly what is it I am learning? Of that I'm not sure -- whether in English or badly translated English or badly pretended English or pretended badly translated English . . .

 

Whew,

I'm feeling better now

 

I see you're wakin'-up those old threads again. Listen, ran60... just a word to the wise...

You're new here, so, honesttogod, I really am tryin' to help you: Before posting in a thread like this one, you might wanna' consider just sorta' sittin' back and just figuring out which way the wind's blowin' on threads like this one. Go back and read older threads, maybe... and make sure you're fully tuned-in to the history of things between certain players here; and who's who and what's what. Be careful who you agree with or defend until you know who stands where, on what, and/or why. After all, you don't want to come across being defensive about, for example, someone whom most members around here think is a troll or a mill shill or something of that nature.

I'm not saying you did anything wrong here. But I can tell from your post that you're not really aware of precisely what you're stepping into, or what you're really commenting on. Knowing a bit of the history of the interchange between some of the players in this thread, and the ongoing issues, etc., would help you, I think.

Just tryin' to help. Seriously. The above is not a criticism. It's more along the lines of friendly advice... and I don't mean that in the ominous way that the classic bad guy means it in bad old "B" movies. I'm serious... just friendly -- with emphasis on the word "friendly" -- advice... meant to seriously help.