So really I am between these two. I like limestones better approach to the theoretical, but I like troys applied approach. I do not like that limestone does not have discrete math, and I don't like that troy does not have computer architecture(limestone has computer organization as an elective not shown on their sheet). Once again The troy guys says this about the different paths at his school: "Applied CS versus CS - Our applied program is the more traditional program that emphasizes the application of CS to business and applications such as programming, DB management, network development and management. The applied program is the more popular program and offered TROY wide. The CS program is more oriented toward computer engineering and theory and is offered by our Montgomery campus. The choice between these two programs is obviously dependent upon ones personal goals. Both of them suffice for preparation for an advanced degree - many of my Applied CS students have obtained advanced degrees in CS and CIS from other universities and are now instructors themselves. The choice is based upon whether you prefer theory or practice - although both cover theory also - one just more than the other. " I can't get squat for info out of the limestone guys. Cost difference is about $5k less for troy. Troys Program Limestones Program What is your guys opinion on the two? I would prefer one of these two so I don't really want any extra suggestions if you all don't mind on other schools. Thoughts?
Troy is less expensive and has communicated with you to your satisfaction. You seem to have good vibes about troy and they have been responsive to your needs so far. I'd say stick with Troy University. If you need a course in computer architecture, you can always enroll as a non-degree seeking student at a second university or college and complete the course there.
Thanks for the reply. I guess my concern is that the more theoretical path of limestone might actually prepare me better for the future. Maybe I am mistaken , but it would seem a better theoretical foundation would overall make you a better software engineer.
Absolutely, for software engineers a degree focusing on theory (data structures, computer architecture, compiler design, comparative programming languages, operating system structure) will be of more use than a degree focusing primarily in practical application (specific programming languages and products). Software engineering and computer programming are not the same animal.
Thats what I think sentinel however, every single person I know who works as a software guy in business doesn't use a lick of these things and they all say they are useless to them. So then I am torn.
My wife studied electrical engineering at a college of engineering. She has many years of corporate experience in electrical engineering. For fields such as software, electrical, and industrial engineering, a theoretical base is necessary to understand practical knowledge ( This is what she is telling me as I am writing this reply ). My wife desired more practical knowledge from her electrical engineering program. This is the what other engineering students have told me as well. Based on the information I have picked from students and faculty, it is beneficial to grasp the theoretical concepts of engineering. However, a greater focus on practical knowledge is widely sought and desired.
Err.. HUH? What does that mean? Troy is not untheoretical. It is just lighter. For instance it doesn't study compiler design, or OS design, or theory of automata, but it does study algorithms, software analysis and development stuff. Maybe I should blend the two and get the Tromstone degree.
I would get a firm grounding of theory at the undergrad level and focus on applied courses at the graduate level. You could also combine a limestone degree with an applied certificate in software engineering or computer science.
For what it's worth, I always preferred the applied approach. Easier for me to conceptualize. But I wouldn't confuse it with being trivial or lesser than theory - rather, it is just different. Of course, I've met lots of theorists who disagreed with me. For instance, some bigtime theory guys hold that 'pure' theory is devoid of any practical application...which just isn't my cup of tea. Greg
I like Troy University better than Limestone College. I completed my degree in 24 months of course I took lot of CLEP, DANTES, and Military Training before applying there. GO ALL THE WAY TROJANS...Everybody needs Trojans. lol
But tekman.. even you said you felt that troys program was too light on theory. Am I right? that is why I like limestone.. the theory.
Xarick, Well, Troy University used to issue B.S in Computer Science, but not any more. It is B.S in Applied Computer Science. I understand what you are looking at. Well, if you want to be an expert in something, you have to work hard on it. Besides, distance learning requires more self study than lecture from the Professor. I am more into Computer Networking and hardware area; therefore, doesn't matter. If you want a solid degree in Computer Science; you should go to University of Illinois at Springfield. Besides, if you go to apply for the job. Most of the Employers know that Troy University is formerly Troy State University. I don't know they know where is Limestone College. Be honest, I never of Limestone College until I did the research, even though Western-Kennedy University is more popular than LC. Good Luck with your decission.
Thanks tekman. I am actually more fond of troys applied program than the UIS program for reasons I won't go into. Troy seems to have a solid grasp of why they went with the applied program and feel very strongly that it is the better option for those who don't want to do research, but instead want to work as a business/software type programmer.
