https://www.npr.org/2021/09/07/1027130578/for-8-years-a-wall-street-journal-story-haunted-his-career-now-he-wants-it-fixed Effectively, the WSJ article (https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323398204578485411420518702: Former Education Official Faces Federal Investigation) notes that he was under investigation. That investigation ultimately revealed the claims were unfounded. But WSJ refuses to issue any kind of update, re-reporting or correction. And his critics continue to cite the investigation as reason to believe he is culpable or guilty of something. He was exonerated twice, except for breaching an internal White House policy: Do journalists have a responsibility to follow up when their stories take on a life of their own, or are used in ways they didn't intend?
Interesting. As inconvenient as this would be, if all he wants is a correction, I wonder whether he should sue for libel, then tell them he'll drop the suit with prejudice if they'll issue one.