Douglass Dissertation Analysis Proves many Do Not have a Life!

Has anybody noticed the title of this thread. It cracks me up that a debate started with this title....... how ironic!

Rich - I hope my dissertation gets this much attention (come to think of it, maybe I don't)

 

Which was my point origanlly, if some of these (one in particular) would put 1/4 as much effort in to studying that person would not need to defend his choice so much.

HEY PEOPLE GET A LIFE OR AT LEAST STUDY SOME!

 

As Decimon suggested, some of us are studying life by distance learning.

 

I don't think Rich said it was a false statement. I think he said there was a punctuation error.

Three other people who actually read the diss have confrmed the quote as correct.

I can't understand why everyone is denying the existence of the conclusions in this excellently done, ground-breaking dissertation.

Why do I suffer criticism when I praise Rich's achievement?

 

May I suggest that you take your trolls elsewhere?

 

Hi Han: It's not a debate. It's Dennis.

 

I just don't understand why everyone is belittling Rich's dissertation and denying direct quotes.

I think it is a landmark study but people start acting so strangely when the conclusions are quoted.

If the conclusions are somehow not supported by the research, Rich would be the one to question, not me.

Sorry for agreeing with Rich's conclusions.