St. Regis group is still at it

Discussion in 'Accreditation Discussions (RA, DETC, state approva' started by galanga, Sep 24, 2005.

Loading...
  1. asakazad

    asakazad New Member

    Why should I worry?

    Dear Lerner,
    Thank you for your advice and support.

    It looks like, there are few people who are in this forum itself working for others to damage this forum.

    This forum is having a good agenta to fight against Diploma mills. But few people here do not allow some people to contribute and thus making indirect support to diploma mill guys.

    Especially THIS IS TRUE when I talk about St Regis guys.

    By criticizing the contributors, few guys are making the contributors to run away from this forum.

    There is no meaning in fighting with the people who are in the same side.

    It looks like, these few guys do not want some people to testify against somebody. WHY?
     
  2. DesElms

    DesElms New Member

    Re: Why should I worry?

    You posted only one minute after I did, so I trust you simply didn't see my admonition to get back on topic. That's understandable and no problem there.

    But let's get back on the topic of the St. Regis gang and not where everything now seems to have strayed.

    I'm saying this mostly because I think you, Azad, are getting all caught-up in, and distracted by, the bickering and are, therefore, not contributing what I suspect could be some pretty good and interesting information and commentary about the St. Regis folks.

    I don't know about everyone else here, but I really would be interested in reading things you have to say about that gang... what you know, who you know, what your opinion is about the search warrant, what you think about what they're now doing and how, etc., etc. Stick with that and I, for one, will be reading every word.
     
  3. bullet

    bullet New Member

    impress

    (1) The St REGIS group: shows they will not pass away.

    Which is actually GOOD because it's boring not having any name brand paper sellers to dissect.

    (2) I was asking "asado" to tell us about the trip to SEBORGA.

    :D
     
  4. bullet

    bullet New Member

    Re: Re: Why should I worry?

    SNIP:

    Me too.

    So get with it asado; we have been waiting and waiting.
     
  5. asakazad

    asakazad New Member

  6. DesElms

    DesElms New Member

    Wait a minute. Ho 'da fone. How can that one be "new"?

    The .edu top-level domain (TLD) has, for several years, now, only been issued to institutions that are accredited by an agency approved by the US Department of Education (USDE) and/or its Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA).

    Any institution using the .edu TLD that isn't accredited by a USDE- and/or CHEA-approved agency was grandfathered-in... so, therefore, has to have existed for at least a few years, now.

    So, bottom line: Ain't no way the entity calling itself The International Univesity of Grandview, USA is "new."

    Just wanted to get that one straight, right outta' the gate.
     
  7. uncle janko

    uncle janko member

    Thanks. Now if they'd just put up a blog we could all go and defer to 'em.
     
  8. miguelstefan

    miguelstefan New Member

    Well, sort of. As I understand it, if an institution has an .edu domain they may sell it to another. The domain can even be renamed by the purchaser. There have been some instances were an intitution has closed down, sold it's domain to a third party, and the party in question had it renamed and re-routed. If I am not mistaken that's how a widely know WAUC member university got theirs.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 30, 2005
  9. John Bear

    John Bear Senior Member

    The Chronicle of Higher Education reporter who has written on .edu several times told me he has a list of 14 or 15 fake or dubious institutions who have gotten an .edu within the last 12 months -- some by buying it, some in error. Recall that more than 400 junior colleges were erroneously given edus in the earlier days. Ezell and I have been urging the Department of Commerce to revoke the license of the present grantor of edus (they have that right), and either do it themselves, or give it to someone reliable.
     
  10. asakazad

    asakazad New Member

    Dixie is Expert

    Yes. I agree to you all. Dixie is an expert in UNIVERSITY Website sales and purchase.
     
  11. asakazad

    asakazad New Member

    Evidences

    Dear All,
    I will post the details only if I have evidences to prove. I have number of evidences against Dixie et all and I can prove their local operations in India are perfectly illegal.

    Who gave them permission to run the Panama Canal University in Manikanda Residency, JP Nagar 5th Phase, Bangalore?

    They are always illegal and still continuing the business with the support of local (Indian ) law enforcement officers.
     
  12. Rich Douglas

    Rich Douglas Well-Known Member

    Re: spyware from St. Regis

    BTW, Although cookies are used as with all forums, there is no "spyware" used here. GG LIES.

    We do not care who or where you are.

    If you want NO spyware, do not user any forum including DI.

    Ed



    The really long post excerpted above equates cookies with spyware, saying if you want to avoid spyware, you have to avoid Degreeinfo. This doesn't appear to be true. Yes, DI uses cookies, but cookies and spyware aren't the same thing. Spyware is used to surreptitiously report your web habits to whomever placed the spyware. It is also used to hijack browsers and other nasty things. Cookies don't do that.

    I notice that "Jamesville" uses spyware. Ad-Aware picks up several after every visit. Of course, Ad-Aware leaves legitimate cookies (also used at "Jamesville") alone. Doubleclick and questionmarket are just two I've seen there recently. Nasty thing, that.

    So, go out and have your fun. But use protection. You'll be glad you did.
     
  13. Alan Contreras

    Alan Contreras New Member

    A ".edu" extension should always be considered a meaningless series of letters. There are far too many bad ones loose out there for the .edu to ever recover its meaning unless there is a forced purge, which will be politically difficult.

    Our web site has carries a warning against believing .edu for some time now.
     

Share This Page