The Arithmetical Mr Azad

You've no doubt noticed that some time has passed and I confess that I do not remember...maybe you could remind me...
What was promised? And, what was done?
Jack

 

Yeah, mineralhh... always make sure that that to which you're responding -- especially when you revive old threads -- is still current information. Enlighten us.

 

Ha, ha, ha, ha!



Abner

 

My apologies, from other posts I had assumed that the SRU affidavit was about to become a "bestseller". Mr. Azad came to this board promising revelations about SRU over and over, sparking distrust and some not-so-positive-comments from board members from the very beginning of his appearence. As the affidavit reveals (somewhere towards the end), he actually did pass the promised pile of information although not to this board but to Dr. Gollin personally to which the affidavit refers to on a couple of pages. After all negative that has been repeatedly said about Mr. Azad, I felt like adding this more positive facet.

 

Thanks. I hadn't read the entire document and just wasn't sure what you were referring to. Have a pleasant holiday.
Jack

 

We're applauding people for doing the right thing, now?

 

>We're applauding people for doing the right thing, now?

I refrain from citing your past posts. so overall yes, for you it would be appropriate to start applauding. And I will also join in once you have cut your overly lengthy signature (now I see the real purpose of the scrollwheel, seriously: there are still people with 800*600 resolution!)

 

So this is just a personal attack, then, no? Your response has nothing whatsoever to do with what I asked. It's just a personal pot shot taken at me apparently because I don't happen to agree with you that there's anything redeeming about Azad helping authorities, even if only indirectly by giving information to George Gollin.

When a bad guy decides to roll-over and help authorities, he doesn't deserve applause. He's still a bad guy... or, if no longer, then at least a former one. Helping authorities is what's expected of him as part of his obligation under the implied social contract. Failing to do so shows a lack of any kind of moral compass; and applauding him for doing so is, under the circumstances, inappropriate.

But let's examine your moral compass, shall we? Precisely what are you stifling yourself from "citing [in my] past posts" which would illustrate your point that it would be appropriate, in my case, to now start applauding? What, precisely, did you mean by that? Or are we all now about to be witness to your cowardice and inability to either stand by or bring meaning to your hateful, not-well-thought-out words.

And what, besides a childish personal attack for lack of anything substantive and meaningful, could your criticism of my signature possibly be? What... are you 12 or something?

Do you have a complaint about me that actually amounts to anything, or is this just you embarrassing yourself and being a putz?

 

funny, i didn't see a personal attack..... Just a slam on your overly long signature.

 

Gee whiz, Misha, if you're going to play copy-editor...

 

i don't get it. sorry.

 

thanks for cutting your signature, makes it a lot easier to scroll on low-res screens.

"Hateful, embarassing, cowardice"...the last person who used these words on one of my posts has just substituted his James monroe phd with a phd from Ecole Superieur I prefer keeping this highly interesting discussion via pm...

 

http://www.recipesource.com/soups/chili/turkey-black-bean1.html