Check out this site Scroll down and click on the link "Olbermann mocks O'Reilly's threats (video)" lmao O'Reilly is such a retard. (No offense to retards intended.) I'm shaking in my boots hoping Fox Security doesn't get wind of this post.
Approximately 2.5 million viewers watch "O'Reilly Factor". Approximately 250,000 viewers watch "countdown with Keith Olberman" Who is the bigger retard?
I don't watch either of them, but until I see an Olbermann clip approaching anything near the lunacy of what I've seen of O'Reilly, my money's on O'Reilly as the bigger retard.
These days it's pretty easy to tell who will have the bigger ratings. Use the *sshole factor: The bigger the *sshole, the bigger the ratings. I'm really hoping that civilized debate will make a comeback.
Re: Re: Olbermann v. O'Reilly The same argument holds for those who eat at McDonalds vs. those who eat at a smaller, heathier alternative. Who's the bigger retard? Those who eat at McDonalds it would seem.
I like McDs. And even though I haven't heard him more than a handful of times, I like O'Reilly. I doubt neither admission surprises anyone here, coming from me.
Re: Re: Re: Olbermann v. O'Reilly Actually, I would wonder whether there are grounds for a libel suit here. I eat at McDuck's. And I chain-smoke two packs of generic menthol cigarettes a day. And I have a genius-level IQ. I simply don't give a rip if I dfie of a massive heart attack or lung cancer at a relatively young age.
Dying is the easy part. It's the quality of life up to that that's hard. As a hospice volunteer who's watched several people die of lung cancer, I can tell you that "I simply don't give a rip if I dfie of... lung cancer at a relatively young age" is one of the most asinine statements I've seen in a while. It's your life, though. Enjoy.
I concur. Unless the cancer is detected at an advanced stage of metastasis a lingering death from cancer really puts one's loved ones through the wringer. I hypothesize that a slow death from cancer negatively affects the health and life expectancy of survivors in the family.
Actually, I think they're both jerks, but I think Olbermann is a bigger jerk. How petty and childish of Olbermann to constantly attack O'Reilly with his "Worst person in the world" segment. To me, Olbermann comes across as a spoiled brat who can't handle the fact that FOX kicks the ever lovin' daylights out of MSNBC every night. Olbermann's ratings are a freakin' rounding error for O'Reilly. There are big city local stations that draw more viewership than Olbermann's little TV "project." BTW, if I were Olbermann, I'd be really careful about the constant personal attacks on O'Reilly. Some of us remember his history when he was with ESPN. People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw rocks. O'Reilly doubtless knows the facts, and I think he has demonstrated remarkable restraint. The best thing for O'Reilly to do is just ignore the punk. To do otherwise only causes people to tune in to Olbermann out of curiosity. But hey, isn't that they game plan from Keith's angle? Olbermann once had the potential to be a serious, credible journalist. He's blown his chance to smitherines. BTW #2: What REALLY cracks me up is when Olbermann signs off with "Good Night and Good Luck," like he's Edward R. Morrow. Oh puh-leeze Keith! Puh-leeeeeze!