https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/26/us/politics/julie-swetnick-avenatti-kavenaugh.html Julie Swetnick graduated high school in 1980 before attending the University of Maryland. Brett Kavavnaugh graduated high school in 1983. 1980 <-> 1983. Swetnick says she attended at least 10 house parties with Kavavnaugh and Judge between 1981 and 1983. Swetnick, now a legal adult, relates heavy drinking and the drugging of the punch bowl for the purpose of raping girls. The boys, apparently, did not drink the punch. Swetnick, a legal adult among high school kids, did nothing to prevent the rapes she claimed were happening and reported nothing to the police. Isn't that interesting?
If Julie Swetnick's testimony is accepted as the truth, then: She was a legal adult She attended a binge drinking party with under-aged juveniles She did nothing to stop the illegal drinking, but instead, she partook herself. Why would an adult woman go to a high school party to get drunk (and vulnerable) with teenagers? Swetnick's story does not make sense.
If there are elements to the story that do not make sense to you then you should be interested in having professional investigators looking into it, no?
