Stormey Daniels and the porn star - she files a lawuit against Trumpeta

Damn, what a cochino!

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-tries-silence-stormy-daniels-n854646

I guess the contract is null and void because Trump didn't sign it! Lord knows what will happen! I guess he doesn't worry about aids. It's also very curious that Trump doesn't attack this women like he did all the others. I think Stormey will win the lawsuit.

 

It's entertaining, but my guess nothing major will happen. This could be major embarrassment for Trump, but since he has no shame, he is immune. May throw the lawyer under the bus I guess.

It's "his personal Vietnam". Brave, brave man. And true Christian.

Perhaps he has feelings for her.

Linking to the coverage from a week ago: clearly Trump has access to better porn actresses than Oleg Deripaska (even though Oleg is younger, most likely wealthier, and has bigger yacht than Trump). Stormy looks much more attractive than Nastya Rybka. Winning, I suppose.

 

If he has any brains at all (I know, it's an open question) then he'll be more worried about what Melania will do rather than what Stormy will do. Grounds for divorce that could include the division of all assets. If they weren't already sleeping in separate bedrooms then they will be now.

 

"Michael Wolff"

 

You know what I think? That's quite a talent.

 

Stormy Daniels is a sign of the Apocalypse

http://thefederalist.com/2018/03/19/stormy-daniels-sign-apocalypse/

 

More on Stormy! Go Stormy, it's your birthday!

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/lie-detector-test-shows-stormy-daniels-truthful-about-trump-affair-n858281

"The report, prepared by a Las Vegas company called Western Security Consultants, says the purpose of the polygraph examination was to "determine if Ms. Clifford had vaginal intercourse with Donald Trump in July 2006."

 

Don't forget, there are at least two other sex scandal lawsuits in process in addition to the Daniels suit.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/03/20/trump-sex-scandal-lawsuits-daniels-476728

 

Sheesh!!!!!!!!! They are hot on his trail now.

 

Scandal? Are you Nina Burleigh?

 

Perhaps your right. Perhaps when it comes to Trump this is not a scandal. I guess it's just everyday, normal behavior for him.

 

More on Stormy

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/379889-stormy-daniels-lawyer-posts-photo-of-mystery-disc-in-a-safe

 

Another thing that will be interesting to watch is the attitude of the evangelical community toward Trump's sexual "transgressions." In short, they don't seem to care very much that he's had X number of extra-marital affairs and has boasted openly about his history of sexually molesting women (I'm still waiting for that Russian pee-pee tape to surface, then we'll see how they deal with that piece of garbage). Of course, they get to forgive and forget as they like. It will, however, make it virtually impossible for them to criticize the next Democrat who gets caught with his hand in the cookie jar (so to speak). As for me, I don't really care. He can have sex with anyone who's willing to hold their breath for 2 minutes as far as I'm concerned. It does take away his ability to preach on all those nice "family values" topics that politicians are so fond of going on and on about. As for the lawsuits, I'm happy to let them all get settled in court in whatever way the law sees fit.

 

Guy's not about the family values anyway, and the only Christians I know who voted for him held their noses and made the choice between what they viewed as two evils--and Trump won their votes by a narrow margin. My brother in law was a big time Ben Carson supporter, but when he lost out, he felt the only option was Trump, as that was the party's choice.

Of course there is the parade of usual suspects, such as Falwell, Jr. and Jeffress, who seem to support him regardless of what he has done, but those people are primarily political and power animals and there's some legitimate question whether they represent historic Christianity at all.

I didn't vote for him and never will unless God Himself tells me to vote Trump. I'm not even a Republican. But I will say one thing: there's plenty of blame and hypocrisy to go around, as there always has been and always will be, because humans by very nature seem to default to hypocrisy. I remember a lot of feminists and those who'd very rightly stamp their feet in favor of Title IX somehow found a way to throw enthusiastic support the way of Bill Clinton, whose sexual adventures made Trump look like a piker by comparison.

 

I didn't say anything about Trump's family values. Clearly he has none. I'm talking about the alleged family values of the evangelical right. Those folks seem pretty happy to look the other way when it comes to Trump's (lack of) family values. Will they then be just as silent regarding the "sins" of Democrats? We will see. As for comparing the indiscretions of Trump to those of Clinton, I think the numbers indicate that Trump is the bigger cheater.

http://www.newsweek.com/how-many-times-trump-cheated-wives-780550

In any case, I'm sure you'll be tuned in to 60 minutes tomorrow night to see the Stormy Daniels interview. It promises to be enlightening. Her attorney tweeted yesterday and indicated that they have (video)tapes of the two of them together.

 

Actually, you did make reference to Trump and family values:

I was responding to that statement above, actually agreeing with you, saying the guy's not about the family values schtick anyway. My response was reasonable and directly addressed a point you made. So I don't understand your first sentence except perhaps that you just forgot what you typed and were in a vaguely hostile mood towards me. Why, I have no clue.

I addressed that above, to tell you that in my anecdotal experience the evangelical right is NOT giving him a pass on his multiple wives, catting around, and general vulgarity. I have yet, in my experience, to meet a single evangelical who just looks the other way. Most of them think he's something of a pig--but generally less a pig than Hillary Clinton. I think for the most part evangelicals figured they got pro-life (at least nominally) from him and certain other issues, and gulped hard and voted for him. Again, I did not vote for him and never will--and neither did I vote for Ms Clinton or anyone else. I am also not part of the evangelical right and doubt I'll ever identify with that group again.

I still contend--and I'm absolutely right--that a lot of Democrats looked the other way at Bill Clinton's peccadillos and looked the other way because they got pro choice and other issues from him. I see no difference.