Question for online instructors: Plagiarism

Discussion in 'Online & DL Teaching' started by suelaine, Oct 9, 2012.

Loading...
  1. suelaine

    suelaine Member

    Messages:
    247
    Likes Received:
    1
    Occupation:
    Online professor
    My students are teachers working on their Master's Degree. They have to turn all their work in to Turnitin. I have to download their work from Turnitin.

    A recent assignment required them to create a rubric for a performance task. They were given resources such a "Rubistar" which includes a rubric generator. This asks teachers questions about the assignment, and generates a rubric based on the questions. This is a very nice tool. I sincerely believe the intent of this website is that teachers can use the rubric that is generated, as is, making any small modification needed to fit their individual circumstances.

    Well my supervisors are saying that because the generated rubrics have much of the same wording, that the high percentage matches on Turnitin are unacceptable and we should tell students they are plagiarizing, and we must make them do the assignment over again, rewording the rubric completely.

    It is my opinion that this defeats the entire purpose of providing a tool such as a "rubric generator." I do believe that students should credit the website and tool in the paper they write which includes this as an appendix, but that including the wording generated by that tool within the rubric itself does not constitute plagiarizing! I'm curious about what other instructors out there think about this.
     
  2. SteveFoerster

    SteveFoerster Resident Gadfly

    Messages:
    10,985
    Likes Received:
    17
    Occupation:
    This and that on the Internet
    Location:
    Northern Virginia & Dominica, West Indies
    I've taught courses in HTML where for some assignments students could use authoring tools, and it would make no sense for me then to turn around and call them plagiarists for doing so. Your supervisors are focusing on rules for their own sake rather than considering the actual reasons for the rules, so to the extent you can ignore them, I think you should.
     
  3. ahardinjr

    ahardinjr New Member

    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    0
    I concur with you. The students should definitely cite and give credit to the website and Rubistar tool; however, use of the tool to create a rubric should not constitute plagarism.

    Plagarizing is to pass off anothers work or ideas as your own, so as long as your students are properly giving credit to the website and tool, then they should be fine.
     
  4. graymatter

    graymatter New Member

    Messages:
    458
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    LPC, Adjuct Faculty
    Interesting. My issues are usually the other way around: administration saying that what I believe to be clear academic dishonesty is simply "poor citations."
     
  5. Rich Douglas

    Rich Douglas Active Member

    Messages:
    11,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree with ahardinjr and Steve. Anti-plagiarizing tool are just that: tools. They should not be used as substitutes for judgment.

    Use the rubric generator, cite its use, and carry on. Gee, if you use a survey instrument used by others, is that plagiarism? Of course not. If it's been validated, that's good research technique.
     

Share This Page