Las Vegas shootings

Discussion in 'Off-Topic Discussions' started by Kizmet, Oct 2, 2017.

Loading...
  1. 03310151

    03310151 Active Member


    And the government was trying to take their guns away. Curtailing their 2A rights.
     
  2. decimon

    decimon Well-Known Member


    That was a government project.
     
  3. heirophant

    heirophant Well-Known Member

    The largest mass shooting on US soil probably took place during the Civil War.
     
  4. Johann

    Johann Well-Known Member

    Agreed. From what I've heard, media are careful to call the Las Vegas shooting the largest U.S. mass shooting in recent history./U].

    I assume you are referring to Wounded Knee. Article here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wounded_Knee_Massacre
    Yes - Wounded knee definitely all-time worst in terms of fatalities. More shooters.

    J.
     
  5. Johann

    Johann Well-Known Member

    Don't address me as a child, Maniac. I'm 74, FFS. I know those differences. My point: a few actions are needed that might, in aggregate, reduce ALL felonious shootings. Some to curb (mainly) home invasion shootings and some aimed at the possibility of lone screwballs. If you wanted suggestions - and you probably didn't - I could have provided some, but I don't think I'll bother, now. I get the impression no one here wants to hear them.

    J. (known on another U.S. forum as "the nutless Canadian retard with no gun.")
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 4, 2017
  6. Maniac Craniac

    Maniac Craniac Moderator Staff Member

    No offense intended. They were analogies to lead you to see where I was going with my post.
     
  7. Johann

    Johann Well-Known Member

    OK. We're good. None taken, then. Thanks.

    J.
     
  8. Maniac Craniac

    Maniac Craniac Moderator Staff Member

    *whew*

    You're one of my favorite people here :You_Rock_Emoticon:
     
  9. jhp

    jhp Member

    Chicago is not the best example; but France is.

    No full or semi-automatics allowed without some arduous requirements. 1,000 rounds max. I go through that much in a week.
    Several recent events used machine guns.

    Let's be honest. Most who are vying for more gun laws want all guns eliminated from citizens' hands with some very few exceptions.

    Strict laws are irrelevant for those who lack the moral compass in the first place. What makes you think they will care about distant laws when their intent is to murder?
     
  10. Stanislav

    Stanislav Well-Known Member

    They might not care. But guns are much more available when they can be sold legally. Also, not all gun deaths are caused by committed terrorists; many are domestic disturbances, accidents, mental health problems, and suicides. More legal hurdles will deter some of these.
    It's not rocket science, jhp. Funny thing is, most gun rights advocates also back abortions restrictions - under exactly parallel logic. They argue, simultaneously, that wider legal access would promote supply and demand, and that it won't. Simple logic theorem states that an inference agent holding two contradictory beliefs would believe anything; maybe it explains Trump.
     
  11. jhp

    jhp Member

  12. decimon

    decimon Well-Known Member


    Mostly suicide.
     
  13. Kizmet

    Kizmet Moderator

    There are 44,000 suicides per year (plus or minus). The methods vary, some clearly by firearm. I'm not aware of a breakdown. Maybe someone has those stats. I know that a lot of car accidents are actually suicides. A Police Officer friend once told me that whenever you hear about a single car accident, especially at night, the first thought of the investigating Officer is "Was this a suicide?" Very common, difficult to prove. If I had to guess I'd say that most firearm deaths were robberies/drug-related but I have no idea if that's true.

    https://afsp.org/about-suicide/suicide-statistics/
     
  14. SteveFoerster

    SteveFoerster Resident Gadfly Staff Member

    Interesting. I assume one might choose that way to go to ensure life insurance pays out to ones dependents?
     
  15. 03310151

    03310151 Active Member

  16. Kizmet

    Kizmet Moderator

  17. Johann

    Johann Well-Known Member

    In Canada, it's even more stark: From article linked below: "In Canada, about 80 per cent of firearm-related deaths are suicides."

    Article showing some holes in the typical Canadian perspective. Regardless, I do feel safer here. Much safer. I haven't been across the border in 20+ years. I used to go whenever I felt like a really good meal, or a favourite star, e.g. B.B. King, Dizzy Gillespie, Buddy Guy, was playing in the area. No more. https://beta.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/why-canada-has-a-gun-problem/article29642837/?ref=http://www.theglobeandmail.com&

    J.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 5, 2017
  18. decimon

    decimon Well-Known Member

  19. Johann

    Johann Well-Known Member

    Indeed we can't. But I'll take gun suicide numbers (which were under discussion) at oh - pretty near face value. A person shoots another, who dies: not suicide. Shoots self = suicide. Accidents do happen, of course, in both categories.

    Overall suicides - I agree, numbers can be fudged to a greater degree - but we were "sticking to our guns" to the exclusion of all other suicides - or at least I thought so.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 5, 2017
  20. decimon

    decimon Well-Known Member


    I gave credit to the late, unlamented mayor of NYC, John Vliet Lindsay, for at least one thing. He recognized that crime was being underreported. The system he found was precinct commanders being graded for how much crime/serious crime occurred in their precincts. That led to crimes being downgraded or nor recorded. Just perhaps, an ambiguous death might be recorded as suicide with no further investigation.

    That's just one possibility.
     

Share This Page