disagreement= academic fraud ?

Discussion in 'Off-Topic Discussions' started by revans, Dec 5, 2004.

Loading...
  1. rocco5

    rocco5 member

    Re: train up a child, or, the sorrows of Albion, or, Gorgiasms, anyone?


    You are hardly one to lecture another on ethics. Read your own brutal, verbal trashing of those whose views you oppose. It is interesting that two posers (oops, posters Sainz and Janko) who are quite nasty to others shout the loudest about ethics and TOS. Los burros hablan de las orejas.
     
  2. Gus Sainz

    Gus Sainz New Member

    Re: Re: train up a child, or, the sorrows of Albion, or, Gorgiasms, anyone?

    Desperately resorting to blatant ad hominem attacks instead of the usual fabricated accusations, implausible denials, and inane blathering to detract from the issue at hand, is tacit recognition that the end is indeed rapidly approaching. :rolleyes:
     
  3. uncle janko

    uncle janko member

    Paging Pink Floyd, or, Parts Is Parts

    The Primal Hermaphrodite, straight (?) out of Plato's "Symposium", mistakes my intention.
    I wasn't lecturing to, um, it/them. I was describing it/them.

    I don't disagree with it/them. I only disagree where there are ideas with which to disagree.

    This, I can only denounce: its/their nihilistic behaviour, its/their contempt and flouting of the TOS, its/their persistent fraudulent posting, its/their ad hominem attacks, and its/their very long track record of abuse on onlinecollege, collegehints, and here.
     
  4. Bill Huffman

    Bill Huffman Well-Known Member

    I find it very amusing when people stand on soap boxes and scream self righteously about their delusions of persecution. It really is a crack up.
     
  5. rocco5

    rocco5 member

    Re: Paging Pink Floyd, or, Parts Is Parts

    Verbal abuse and vicious descriptions, mixing a bit of fact with much fiction, is your M.O., Janko; and Sainz is not far behind. Do you really expect intellegent, educated folks to take you seriously (except as a master of invective) ? Play in your own dirty sandbox, boys. Why don't you apply the TOS yourselves, if you are as ethical as you pose ?
     
  6. BillDayson

    BillDayson New Member

    Earth to Degreeinfo:

    You are just giving attention to a troll.
     
  7. Guest

    Guest Guest

    I have just now seen this forum as I have not been able to always access DI in the past few days and could only access it when someone posted to a forum I was subscribed to.

    I see a trend here. I see aed. I hope free and open debate and discussion, in a civil manner, will eventually prevail on this forum.

    I see no need to drag aed tripe onto DI. Each of us has an opinion on the many subjects discussed here. Many of us can state others' views on some subjects (accredited vs. unaccredited, RA vs. NA) verbatim. Why dredge this up all over again?

    Let's move forward with civility, objectivity, and common decency lest we cause the demise of this wonderful board.
     
  8. Gus Sainz

    Gus Sainz New Member

    As to who he is and what his motivations are...
    • ”As for me, I am a bored, underemployed ‘academic’ with too much time on my hands who stumbled onto DL fora in a personal investigation about ‘fake’ or ‘alternative’ degrees. I found some very arrogant types at Degree(dis)info who ticked off my big ego by not allowing me to post opinions about SACS. So now I have a bit of fun by pointing out some of their foolishness. It's fun to see how seriously they appear to take themselves and to watch their moralistic diatribes against mills and millists--as if certification IS education.”
      —Dr. Richard Evans (a.k.a., lysias, revans, and rocco5)

    ..and lest there be any doubt as to what his true intentions are, and proof that his posts and nothing more than (self-described) crap...
    • ”Some of the gang are snide and harsh; others are just plain mean as internet personae. How seriously they take themselves I cannot know. My remarks are not meant to hurt or touch their personal lives in anyway, but to smell up their internet postings with same crap they dump on others; perhaps they will be more careful.”
      —Dr. Richard Evans (a.k.a., lysias, revans, and rocco5)

    ...or that his ultimate goal is to be (once again) banned from this forum:
    • ”I humbly accept the highest academic honor in DL education, to be banned from a forum of pseudo-experts, men with no known degrees or names. Thank you, Gus, for mentioning this most distinguished honor. I won the President's Fellowship at Columbia several times, but this is much higher honor, banned multiple times from Degree(dis)info, indeed, summa cum laude. {It beats that 4.0 for the Ph.D., too.}”
      —Dr. Richard Evans (a.k.a., lysias, revans, and rocco5)
     
  9. Bruce

    Bruce Moderator

    I have to admit that I've been a bit derelict in my duties as a moderator lately, simply because I haven't had the time. This latest invasion is at least partially my fault, and I apologize.

    This board will not become a.e.d., as long as Chip sees fit to keep me on as a moderator.
     
  10. uncle janko

    uncle janko member

    Thank you, Bruce. And I am unanimous in that.
     
  11. I'm with Janko.....
     
  12. veritas

    veritas member

    TOS, posting ethics, etc

    A Newbie's perspective: Posters (at least this one was) are asked to agree not post nothing of a vulgar or sexual nature. Does this apply to all posters or are some exempt from this prohibition ? I have noticed some fairly suggestive stuff in this thread, not meant to be literal, I am sure, but doesn't it cross the line a bit, and all this effort just to flush a troll ?
     
  13. uncle janko

    uncle janko member

    Misther Dooley wunders...

    Curious, that this very first post should have a classical-language posting name and sig line, and hold forth the idea that a destructive person should be let alone to be destructive, lest somebody say a durty word.

    One wunders about, um, intertextuality.
     
  14. veritas

    veritas member

    Re: Misther Dooley wunders...

    One wunders about hypocrisy and double standards, too. Do the means justify the ends ? Is that what you believe ? Seems so as that's what you've said. Let's not try to turn an ethical question into an issue of intertextuality, but you probably think that there is no reality outside of language as some fool academicians believe.
     
  15. Bill Huffman

    Bill Huffman Well-Known Member

    It is very suspicious when a newbie's first post picks up in the middle of an old diatribe by someone known for violating the TOS and generating many aliases.
     
  16. veritas

    veritas member

    peace and reconciliation

    Would it not be appropriate to the season's spirit if Evans, Janko and Sainz, all, admitted that there have been times when they have not behaved with verbal dignity; should they not simply disengage, forgive and move on, and in the case of trolls, off the forum ?
    Pax in hominibus bonae voluntatis.
     
  17. BillDayson

    BillDayson New Member

    You know what it reminds me of? That children's game where little heads pop up out of holes and the object is to immediately bop them back down with a hammer. Whack-a-Mole!

    In France, they call it 'deconstruction'.
     
  18. uncle janko

    uncle janko member

    "No reality outside of language" and the Latin litter and the South Carolina supposed location and the enemies list and the toplofty tone all declare:
    'tis the season to be Evans.

    The plea for forgiveness is utter crap: no repentance, no self-criticism, no honesty, no ceasing of destructive behavior, just a specious use of pseudo-religious jargon as the latest manifestation of terminal cutesiness from a shill/troll/hater of DL.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 12, 2004
  19. Gus Sainz

    Gus Sainz New Member

    Veritas (a misnomer if there ever was one) is Dr. Richard Evans (a.k.a., lysias, revans, and rocco5); he exhibits the same unique orthographic idiosyncrasy.

    These antics, however, are consistent with Dr. Evans' cockamamie social and educational theories. I believe he is simply trying to devalue legitimate doctoral degrees by proving that some individuals who hold them consistently act in a crackbrained, puerile, and churlish manner. :rolleyes:
     

Share This Page