Anti-Islamic US biker gang members run security at deadly Gaza aid sites

Bill,

I think your own article actually proves my point more than yours: Jake Wood didn’t resign because he thought feeding Gazans was “evil,” but because he believed it was impossible to meet humanitarian goals under the political and security constraints in Gaza.
That’s a huge difference. His resignation highlights how dangerous and complex the situation is, not that GHF was designed to starve people.

From his own words:

“I am proud of the work I oversaw, including developing a pragmatic plan that could feed hungry people, address security concerns about diversion, and complement the work of longstanding NGOs in Gaza.”

He even called the plan pragmatic and focused on feeding people.
His resignation was about refusing to compromise humanitarian principles—not proof of some sinister conspiracy.

You also left out that the UN and NGOs refused to cooperate with GHF, forcing it to operate alone.
Without coordination, of course, there were fewer sites.
That doesn’t automatically mean Netanyahu or GHF intended famine; it means the aid system collapsed under political infighting, security threats, and logistical chaos.

WE are far away, and I see some sating back and accuse everyone of “evil intent,” but the reality is a lot messier: armed groups are looting aid, aid convoys are being attacked, and no one wants to take responsibility. GHF stepped in because no one else would, without giving in to terror groups.

Blaming security measures or a handful of sites for famine is like blaming a firefighter for a wildfire because they couldn’t save every tree.

 

You are misreading what was said.

You completely ignore the fact that Jack Wood stated, “However, it is clear that it is not possible to implement this plan while also strictly adhering to the humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality, and independence, which I will not abandon,” At the same time you completely ignored my question that I bolded and highlighted, "Why do you think he thought it was an inhumane organization?"

 

He didn’t say that. Jake Wood’s own statement was that it was “not possible to implement this plan while also strictly adhering to the humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality, and independence.” That’s a standards problem under the operating constraints, not a claim that the organization itself is “inhumane.” He explicitly said he was proud of the plan to feed people but wouldn’t compromise core principles.

I could not find any credible, verifiable source saying that Jake Wood explicitly called GHF (Gaza Humanitarian Foundation) an “inhumane organization.”
Is there video, or did I miss a reference?