Re: ag shame
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Civil Discourse == thanks
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Civil Discourse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Civil Discourse
Re: Re: Civil Discourse === Still at me huh Jimmy ? For the record I never condemned Peppler, I said he was credible. I said ITS was to...
+++++++++++ Quinn 1) I was referencing my opinion on SATS , Jimmy was supposing that I NEVER would approve of SATS regardless ,BUT he was...
==== You are expressing what you know, SHAME,SHAME on you!!! Let's all be critical of you for that.
==== You find more fault yet , huh? Aramaic ??? You posture yourself to blow your own horn, eh?
JImmy, you use strawmen: I HAVE repeatedly elsewhere and even in this very this thread said that SATS is credible. BUt may I not make ANY...
=== Didn't realize you HAD to read any. I don't know how many posts , but apparantly not enough to convince the poster at the other...
DING, DING I see that one on the other forum whom I thought was a friend and about whose person and education I believe I NEVER have said an...
Dr Chris, Thanks for your explanation. I think I agree with Bill D. on this. This issue is not quite as simple as "earned" vs. "bought."...
Re: I've never understood this === Good point, but inerrancy in the view of Evangelicals does not require dictation(although obviously...
=== Howard I was using Unk's metaphorical term for disagreement. I thought Unk in his usual crytic and vague manner was expressing...
=== seems : several on DI were jabbed by Peppler and I by Peppler's professor . Do only my jabs count on your scorecard?
Separate names with a comma.