Podesta Group admits to pro-Putin work [DNC-Russian collusion]

Discussion in 'Political Discussions' started by me again, Aug 28, 2017.

Loading...
  1. me again

    me again Well-Known Member

    Full story:
    How do you say 'whoops' in Russian? Podesta Group retroactively files more DOJ disclosures for pro-Putin work
     
  2. Kizmet

    Kizmet Moderator

    So we can expect to see Sessions appoint a Special Prosecutor to investigate, right?
     
  3. Bruce

    Bruce Moderator

    There's already more evidence than there is of Trump-Russia collusion.

    Speaking of which, what's happened to that "story"? You couldn't turn on a TV set not long ago without being bombarded with Trump-Russia stories, and it seems to have completely vanished.

    Gee....I wonder why?
     
  4. me again

    me again Well-Known Member

    The DNC witch-hunt will not connect President Donald J. Trump with Russians. It will backfire and will point back to DNC collisions with Russians. That has been obvious from the beginning, but the DNC is so blinded by confidence, Marxist monies, hatred and rage that they are unable to see an elephant standing in the room. Socialist DNC planners will eventually figure it out, but only when it's too late for a quick recovery. DNC socialists are still enamored by the forced alt.eft script of the MSM. Unenlightened RINOs are also in the DNC mix and they will be find themselves un-electable (eventually).
     
  5. Stanislav

    Stanislav Well-Known Member

    that's actually less than what Manafort and Flynn already admitted. Manafort in particular is a long-time lobbyist for Russia-affiliated interests; how it is you appear not to know that?

    Oops: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/28/us/politics/trump-tower-putin-felix-sater.html

    The fact that Presidential candidate still associated with that small-time shyster Sater speaks volumes; incidentally, also about his business acumen.
     
  6. Bruce

    Bruce Moderator

    Oh, whoa!!!!! Wait a second!!!! Giving you that point for the sake of this debate (not that I believe it), the narrative was always 100% TRUMP-Russia collusion. Impeach 45!!!!

    Why the sudden abandonment of the Trump angle?

    Because the house of cards is tumbling down.

    The NYT keeping the faith with a silly non-story. Did they run out of quality stories like about how many scoops of ice cream the President gets at dinner?
     
  7. Stanislav

    Stanislav Well-Known Member

    Don't believe what, exactly? I've seen the name "Manafort" for a decade before the campaign even started. While Ukrainian thugocrats did hire Dem-affiliated PR firms at times, it was Manafort who was the close advisor to Yanukovich, Firtash, and the rest of them. It wasn't a secret, either: the Party of Thieves was quite proud to employ an "American political technologist", especially one that's by their standards high profile. It does not freakin' need "belief"; it's a fact.



    To summarize: a silly non-story is that Trump tried to make a deal to build a Trump tower in Moscow (and he explicitly denied pursuing any deals in Russia, multiple times); that he was dealing through a career criminal he tries to publicly distance from, for years; and said criminal was talking about getting Putin personally involved. A deal involved the very same family of a Kremlin-connected billionaire (and former Communist Party of the USSR functionary whose Don Jr. friend son was married into a family of one of the top KGB leaders in Soviet times; a family that rules the nation of Azerbaijan since at least early 1980ies) that brokered Don Jr. meeting to get dirt on Hillary. Move along, folks, nothing to see here.
     

Share This Page