+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    decimon is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    4,221

  2. #2
    SteveFoerster is offline Resident Gadfly
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Northern Virginia & Dominica, West Indies
    Posts
    10,858
    Can what be legal , publicly embarrassing cowardly legislators? Yes, and rightly so.
    BS, Info Sys concentration, Charter Oak State College
    MA in Educational Tech, George Washington University
    PhD in Leadership, U. of the Cumberlands (in progress)
    More at http://stevefoerster.com

  3. #3
    decimon is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    4,221
    Quote Originally Posted by SteveFoerster View Post
    Can what be legal, publicly embarrassing cowardly legislators? Yes, and rightly so.

    At their homes?

  4. #4
    Abner is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Cyberspace
    Posts
    7,447
    It mus be legal . They have been doing that here in Cali for quite a while.

  5. #5
    SteveFoerster is offline Resident Gadfly
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Northern Virginia & Dominica, West Indies
    Posts
    10,858
    Quote Originally Posted by decimon View Post
    At their homes?
    On a public street outside their home? Absolutely. Why should their homes be sacrosanct when their legislation affects what I can do at home, what kind of home I can have, and so forth?
    BS, Info Sys concentration, Charter Oak State College
    MA in Educational Tech, George Washington University
    PhD in Leadership, U. of the Cumberlands (in progress)
    More at http://stevefoerster.com

  6. #6
    Abner is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Cyberspace
    Posts
    7,447
    Quote Originally Posted by SteveFoerster View Post
    On a public street outside their home? Absolutely. Why should their homes be sacrosanct when their legislation affects what I can do at home, what kind of home I can have, and so forth?
    Exactly what I was thinking.

  7. #7
    heirophant is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    616
    Quote Originally Posted by decimon View Post
    Can this be legal?
    When it comes to activists disrupting town hall meetings and other political gatherings, I'm inclined to agree with what Trump once said during the campaign. Encourage supporters to physically remove the disruptive bad-actors from the meetings.

    When it comes to legal remedies to assholes demonstrating outside people's homes, I expect that legally speaking it's complicated. There are laws about demonstrating without permits, about blocking streets and public accessways like sidewalks, noise ordinances, laws regarding public nuisances, about civil and criminal harassment, and all kinds of laws that might be applicable. One would have to consult with the lawyers I guess. But liberal judges are apt to side with the demonstrators and call the demonstrators' targeting political opponents' homes, families and neighbors "free speech".

    The alternative might be to do the same thing to Democrats. Plant permanent demonstrations outside Democrats' homes and disrupt their neighborhoods and neighbor's lives as much as legally possible.

    You can just imagine the howls of outrage you would hear in all the media and from all the pundits if the alt.right behaved the same way that the mainstream Democrats already do, outing opponents' home addresses, trapping their families inside their homes and being as disruptive as possible in their neighborhoods.

    The hypocrisy once again wouldn't be lost on the American people.

  8. Advertisement

  9. #8
    Kizmet is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    between the devil and the deep blue sea
    Posts
    15,150
    Quote Originally Posted by heirophant View Post
    When it comes to activists disrupting town hall meetings and other political gatherings, I'm inclined to agree with what Trump once said during the campaign. Encourage supporters to physically remove the disruptive bad-actors from the meetings.
    There's a very fine line between an ordinary citizen physically removing someone from a public meeting and an assault charge. Step lightly.
    American College of Sports Medicine

  10. #9
    SteveFoerster is offline Resident Gadfly
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Northern Virginia & Dominica, West Indies
    Posts
    10,858
    Quote Originally Posted by heirophant View Post
    But liberal judges are apt to side with the demonstrators and call the demonstrators' targeting political opponents' homes, families and neighbors "free speech".
    They'd call it that for good reason. And it wouldn't deserve scare quotes no matter who was doing the speaking and who they were speaking to.
    BS, Info Sys concentration, Charter Oak State College
    MA in Educational Tech, George Washington University
    PhD in Leadership, U. of the Cumberlands (in progress)
    More at http://stevefoerster.com

  11. #10
    heirophant is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    616
    Quote Originally Posted by SteveFoerster View Post
    They'd call it that for good reason.
    Which is?

    And it wouldn't deserve scare quotes no matter who was doing the speaking and who they were speaking to.
    I wasn't trying to "scare" anyone. I was expressing my opinion that the concept of 'speech' has been expanded by ideologues (including ideologues in black robes) to include sometimes dangerous things that aren't even remotely speech.

    I doubt that you would want to argue that the asshole that ran his car into a crowd of protesters in Charlottesville should be Constitutionally protected for doing so, because his behavior constituted 'speech' expressing his forceful political disagreement with the protesters.

    There has to be a line drawn somewhere. So like every question, this turns into a philosophical question.

    My answer to my own implicit question would be that Constitutional rights of free political "speech" (the quotes are there to indicate that lots of things that aren't literally speech are being included in the 'speech' category) need to be limited when the actions deprive other people of equally valid rights.

    Disrupting a political gathering deprives everyone else present of their own rights of assembly and political free speech. Disagreement with a political representative's politics doesn't justify depriving not only the Representative, but his/her family and even their nearby neighbors from pursuing their own life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. Anger at capitalism doesn't justify arson and looting.
    Last edited by heirophant; 08-26-2017 at 07:44 AM.

  12. #11
    decimon is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    4,221
    'The right to swing my fist ends where the other man's nose begins.' has been a quote popular with libertarians. Where, in this case, does the nose end.

    Lots of nice quotes here: FREEDOM KEYS

  13. #12
    SteveFoerster is offline Resident Gadfly
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Northern Virginia & Dominica, West Indies
    Posts
    10,858
    Quote Originally Posted by decimon View Post
    'The right to swing my fist ends where the other man's nose begins.' has been a quote popular with libertarians. Where, in this case, does the nose end.
    At the guy's property line.
    BS, Info Sys concentration, Charter Oak State College
    MA in Educational Tech, George Washington University
    PhD in Leadership, U. of the Cumberlands (in progress)
    More at http://stevefoerster.com

  14. #13
    decimon is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    4,221
    Quote Originally Posted by SteveFoerster View Post
    At the guy's property line.

    And yours? You are, after all, Nazi scum for advocating free speech.

Similar Threads

  1. Is this legal?
    By a mom in forum IT and Computer-Related Degrees
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-20-2006, 10:42 PM
  2. PhD Legal Studies?
    By LadyExecutive in forum General Distance Learning Discussions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-04-2005, 05:31 PM
  3. Is This Legal???
    By sauseda1984 in forum General Distance Learning Discussions
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 02-02-2005, 05:27 AM
  4. The ABA and Legal Education
    By agingBetter in forum General Distance Learning Discussions
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 01-11-2005, 05:52 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts




1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197