Kushner Under Investigation

Discussion in 'Political Discussions' started by Kizmet, Jun 17, 2017.

Loading...
  1. Kizmet

    Kizmet Moderator

  2. me again

    me again Well-Known Member

    For the last year, every leftist MSM article is citing:
    - unnamed officials
    - unnamed sources
    - anonymous sources
    - undisclosed sources

    Not one shred of evidence has ever been presented by the "unnamed sources." Not one shred of evidence will ever be uncovered. The entire DNC investigation is hyperbole. It will be remembered as the biggest charade in the annals of American political history because no wrongdoing was ever disclosed or uncovered. LOL
     
    heirophant likes this.
  3. 03310151

    03310151 Active Member

    It's anti-semitism.
     
  4. SteveFoerster

    SteveFoerster Resident Gadfly Staff Member

    While I'm obviously no friend of this administration, being investigated is par for the course in Washington, D.C. and having lawyers is only smart. This news doesn't mean much.
     
  5. Stanislav

    Stanislav Well-Known Member

    Not to this extent, no. And not when you explicitly told that your opponent being investigated is this major problem.
     
  6. Stanislav

    Stanislav Well-Known Member

    Sorry dude, but the DNC hacking by the Russians is an established fact now. Trump campaign's ties to it is not - yet. And while there intimately may be no evidence of this particular wrongdoing (campaign collusion with the DNC hack), the title of the "biggest charade" firmly belongs to the Clinton Benghazi probes - because no wrongdoing was ever disclosed or discovered.
     
  7. Kizmet

    Kizmet Moderator

    To me, the details of who is being investigated, and for what possible offenses, is less important than the fact that instead of fizzling out and going away, the investigation is getting bigger and building steam. And Steve, while "investigations" may be fairly common in Washington, investigations by a Special Prosecutor are fairly rare and so in my book they mean something "special."

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_prosecutor
     
  8. Abner

    Abner Well-Known Member


    " investigations by a Special Prosecutor are fairly rare and so in my book they mean something "special."

    Good points.
     
  9. me again

    me again Well-Known Member

    Stanislav, hacking by foreign governments has been established and ongoing for many years. It's nothing new. However, not one shred of evidence has been produced to establish collusion between President Donald Trump and the Russians. Stanislav, as a Russian in Canada, why are you colluding with American Democrats in social media?
     
  10. me again

    me again Well-Known Member

    Special Education v. Special Investigations

    Kizmet, the investigation is not getting bigger and building steam. From an evidentiary standpoint, the investigation is dead because no evidence has been uncovered to support the leftists/communists claim that the presidential victor (Trump) allegedly colluded with Russians to achieve his God ordained victory. Conversely, paid leftists (Soros and other bobbleheads) continue sounding the false alarm.

    Kizmet, we also have "special" education in k12, which is akin to leftist appointed "special" investigations in Washington DC. Indeed, it is "special."
     
  11. Johann

    Johann Well-Known Member

  12. Abner

    Abner Well-Known Member

    He he! Now that some funny shit! Or like they say in Spanish "Es funny". (spanglish)

    Abner :smile:
     
  13. Kizmet

    Kizmet Moderator

  14. me again

    me again Well-Known Member

    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 21, 2017
  15. Stanislav

    Stanislav Well-Known Member

    #1: Yet another Clinton probe that would come to nothing, just like 999 probes before it. What Comey described in his testimony, while clumsy political hackery, does not sound remotely like obstruction of justice.
    #2 Way too little information to evaluate, except Page's testimony is "delayed" rather than "blocked". These little fibs kind of discredit the whole article.

    I'd say that in loose relation to #1: Comey said that his bizarre announcements were largely motivated by trying to avoid an appearance of conflict, stemming from Bill's "tarmac summit" with the AG. It's quite clear that it was Comey's grandstanding that cost Hillary the presidency. I'm baffled why no one makes an obvious logical connection: that Hillary Clinton lost because of Bill's extraordinary dumbass "tarmac summit". If you accept Comey's version, then Bill's meddling sabotaged his wife's campaign even more profoundly then was immediately apparent. I think Bill is a brilliant policy nerd and excellent communicator who nevertheless is prone to colossal private judgement fails; there was no excuse for Monica, and no excuse for this. It's bizarre how little does he get called on these episodes of dumb. Part of it is that these facts clash with the Left's revered image of Bill, as well as Right's image of Bill as a genius supervillain. But seeing how Hillary is called out for hair style choices, glasses, pantsuits and whatnot, one can't but notice a clear gendered double standard. Heck, Trump is on record defending Bill on Monica and then attacking Hillary on... Monica, somehow. I think he captures the mood of the nation on this.
     
  16. Kizmet

    Kizmet Moderator

  17. Bruce

    Bruce Moderator

  18. Stanislav

    Stanislav Well-Known Member

    Since it's his personal account, it's a fair bet he deleted at least as many e-mails, simply as part of regular usage. And we already know the man is prone to lying, so... yeah, your hero.
     
  19. Bruce

    Bruce Moderator

    Did he set-up a private server, the use that almost exclusively for sensitive information, specifically to get around FOIA regulations?

    Has he lied about it, under oath, thereby committing a felony?

    Because that's the standard set by Hillary Clinton, who has also set the bar for criminal prosecution. Kushner is an altar boy when using those standards.
     
  20. Stanislav

    Stanislav Well-Known Member

    The problem is, you have to twist reality quite a bit to declare Clinton server was "use(d) almost exclusively for sensitive information". Because that server was used to support HRCs sole handheld device for general e-mail use, everything from purely personal to what was intended as non-classified State use (she did have a classified system that was not mobile).

    Given that your version of events appear to be so twisted, I see no use in trying to discuss it. Kushner emails are an entity of unknown importance; it's just funny to ponder how they appear to be just as cavalier with technology as the person they demolished for it (actually, considering Trump's tweet machine, much more so). Humor. #TrumpEmails #HeLied #LockThemUp
     

Share This Page