\FYI, Trump White House Senior Staff Have Private RNC Email Accounts "But after then-candidate Donald Trump and the Republicans repeatedly called for “locking up” Hillary Clinton for handling government work with a private server while secretary of state, the new White House staff risks repeating the same mistake that dogged the Democrat’s presidential campaign."
Wow, is the left getting desperate!!! Talk about much ado about nothing; the absurdity of that article can be summed up in one line. "risks repeating the same mistake" of Hillary Clinton. Risks repeating the same mistake. That's like publishing an article that President Trump wants to commit suicide, because every time he boards Air Force One, he "risks repeating the same mistake" of the 3,718 people who have died in 747 crashes. :lmao:
Two questions: do you really believe that there's an entity called "the left"? Also, what's with the 3 exclamation points? All I see is the usual news story; as always in specialized domains, it is not of a high enough quality to discern what's going on. The same is true about 99% of Clinton email coverage. I'm enjoying Sessions-Kislyak saga much more. Don't you think AG perjuring himself should be grounds for dismissal? I bet you don't. It's like "the right" spending years on bogus claims that Obama "apologized for America", but when Trump slanders America ("there are a lot of killers. do you think we're so innocent?") - dead silence. BTW, the President legitimately earned a Russian decoration for that interview (it's identical in tone and superior in impact to most of RT and Rossiya Segodnya programming - and those guys get decorated for their work). I expect Putin to give Trump his medal when they finally meet.
FBI asked Justice Department to refute Trump's wiretapping claim Man, trump needs to stop listening to fake news outlets like Breibert and Infowars. FBI asked Justice Department to refute Trump's wiretapping claim - CNNPolitics.com "While Spicer said "reports" prompted the call for a congressional investigation, the White House still has not provided any evidence to back up the President's accusations. There are no publicly known credible reports to back up Trump's claim that Obama ordered Trump's phones be monitored."
Absolutely. The people in CNN who gave the Clinton camp the debate questions ahead of time; yeah, I'd say they're "the left". You can't refute what I say, so you're going to try to nitpick my grammar? Weak. Did I mention any of the above? No, I did not. Nice attempt to set up a straw man platoon to knock down.
The Potemkin Village begins to collapse; https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/03/09/report-a-fisa-warrant-was-issued-in-october-to-investigate-russian-hacking/
All it shows is that at some point, someone at FBI was able to articulate a credible suspicion that there are people in or around Trump campaign who effectively work for Russia. And no, you "didn't mention" any of this; I wonder why? I could tell you that right away: you can't get paid millions for political consulting (and illegal lobbying) by pro-Kremlin thugs like Manafort did and NOT be compromised. Also, what's with Trump Tower Baku, built by a local super-corrupt person with business ties with Iranian Revolutionary Guards (a brutal Islamic secret police)? See in another thread. Now we learned that Manafort's associate (Military University of Foreign Languages graduate who early in his career openly stated that his "previous" employer is GRU, or Russian military intelligence) came to Russia during RNC to ask Trump team to water down the party platform on Russia. Which they did, out of the blue. It is a bit of a problem when White House is this full of Russian agents and unwitting agents.
That's not a very Trump-friendly statement, Bruce. Clapper directly contradicts Trump's wiretapping claims. Also, FBI not having evidence of collusion between Trump and the Russians on email hacks at the time does not equate to no Russian links. Heck, Trump has a link to Russian mob through Sater, and this is well known. And through Manafort to Yanukovych to Putin. And through Flynn to Putin. and so on.
charts are fun Rep. Eric Swalwell posts website on Trump-Russia connection – The Mercury News All of Donald Trump’s Ties to Russia and Putin, in 7 Charts - POLITICO Magazine
In many ways, Trump is like Russian oligarchs, a group that arose in the 1990ies. Even the opaque tax situations and the taste for beauty pageants check out. There are a few important things to understand about this group. In the nineties, they owned the country; the most influential group by far. And then came Putin, and he ate them for lunch. Now, they still have the mansions and the yachts and the women, but politically they answer to Putin and the new/old elite, his personal friends and siloviki (lawmen and spies). So think about it. Putin was able to destroy Boris Abramovich Berezovskij PhD Dsc Corr. member RAS (Applied Mathematics), the biggest shark in the tank who actually helped pick Putin as Yeltsin's successor. Why do you think Trump would stand a chance? "Bereza" was both wealthier and more influential than Trump, an effective owner (or co-owner) of the country, and ended his life in suspicious "suicide", as a powerless exile in London. (also, if Trump was indeed in conflict with corrupt "deep state" in the intelligence apparatus - he would lose. No reason to suppose American counterparts to "siloviki" are any worse at their jobs than late-stagnation Soviet ones).
Mark my words; the left and the mainstream media will desperately try to pump life into the Trump/Russian story for as long as they can, and there will N-E-V-E-R be any shred of evidence whatsoever of any sort of collusion. Not a single shred. Once they figure out that continuing to flog a dead and decomposing horse is becoming counterproductive, the whole theory/concept will die a very quiet death, never to be mentioned on CNN, MSNBC, CNBC, or any MSM outlet ever again. It will go down the Memory Hole, and the left will drown their sorrows in Victory Gin.
55-year-old first-time voter who chose Trump protests large increase in health cost Trump care: 55-year-old first-time voter who chose Trump protests large increase in health costs - ABC News "Taken together, premiums for older adults could increase by as much as $3,600 for a 55-year-old earning $25,000 a year, $7,000 for a 64-year-old earning $25,000 a year and up to $8,400 for a 64-year-old earning $15,000 a year," AARP said in its letter. The group said a typical senior seeking insurance on a state exchange has an annual income under $25,000." What a pendeja!
First of all, I think you're wrong. But more importantly: since when did we start demanding "evidence"? It wasn't like this when Clinton got assassinated over "questions raised". Here's more from "the Left": New details put the spotlight back on Trump's Russia scandal | MSNBC. I remember Republican platform story from the RNC very well. Everyone was so dumbfolded by this move, but when you remember the name "Manafort" and know that "defensive lethal weapons" are a huge issue in that conflict, it only makes sense. Dude, your guy made millions building hotels with guys one handshake away from not only Putin, but also the head of Solntsevo mob and Iranian Revolutionary Guard. That's no conjecture: Trump Hotel Toronto and Trump Tower Baku exist, and were built by such men. If there were no collusion before and Putin just decided to help make Donald great again; there's plenty of space for collusion in the future. In the olden days, that was enough to disqualify a candidate for any high office. And, again, KGB spy Putin eats flawed egomaniacs like Trump for snack.
And a prediction of my own: there will be no proof that Obama "tapp" Trump's phone before the election; chiefly because he did not. And the White House will shut up about this. It's not much of a prediction because they already did.
Not a peep from the WH today. Trump was asked about this by reporters, and he just remained silent. He looked like he was constipated or something, or he shit his pants.
Schiff on wiretapping probe: 'We're going to air this very publicly' - CNNPolitics.com "I think what (White House press secretary) Sean Spicer and the President wanted was to take this spurious claim and try to bury it in a closed hearing in the intelligence committee. We're not going to allow that to happen. We're going to air this very publicly," Rep. Adam Schiff told CNN's Chris Cuomo on "New Day." I am wondering something. Trump accused ex President Obama of a felony. I wonder if he can be impeached once it is investigated and nothing comes of it? The media can't let or the people can't let this slide. Trump's pathological lying makes his lies hard to report on because he tells one lie after the other, and many times the lies are forgotten.
