+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Kizmet is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    between the devil and the deep blue sea
    Posts
    15,150

    The Adjunct Solution

    it's one of those, "what if . . ." hypotheticals.

    https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs...junct-solution

  2. #2
    SteveFoerster is offline Resident Gadfly
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Northern Virginia & Dominica, West Indies
    Posts
    10,891
    I'm not unsympathetic to calls for adjuncts to take home more money. But here's where the author loses me:

    I know, crazy. I’m ignoring the reality of market supply and demand, and also job creators, blah blah blah, but it really is this straightforward. If an institution has people doing the core work of instruction and they are paying them less than a living wage they are in an unsustainable situation.
    Many people in higher education pretend that it's not basically a service industry like any other, that instead it's on its own higher plane of existence where the laws of market economics do not apply. Unfortunately, the author is one of these people -- and these people are incorrect.
    BS, Info Sys concentration, Charter Oak State College
    MA in Educational Tech, George Washington University
    PhD in Leadership, U. of the Cumberlands (in progress)
    More at http://stevefoerster.com

  3. #3
    StefanM is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1,373
    Quote Originally Posted by SteveFoerster View Post
    I'm not unsympathetic to calls for adjuncts to take home more money. But here's where the author loses me:



    Many people in higher education pretend that it's not basically a service industry like any other, that instead it's on its own higher plane of existence where the laws of market economics do not apply. Unfortunately, the author is one of these people -- and these people are incorrect.
    You are, of course, correct, but there are additional confounding factors.

    One glaring issue is that there is generally no price differentiation between classes taught by adjuncts and classes taught by full-time instructors or professors.

    It would make some sense to pay adjuncts less if the classes were at a lower tuition rate for students, but in reality, the students take the classes because they are required, and faculty are assigned based on other factors. It's definitely not a pure case of supply meeting demand.

  4. #4
    jhp
    jhp is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    616
    As a "visiting", I find this article very much in mesh with an other thread of "professors becoming more liberal". Moving south on the Nolan chart.

    Of course, the author destroys his own hypothetical scenario, and self labels as "crazy".
    I’m ignoring the reality
    I guess the the whole suggestion is about the author feeling good about himself, since it has no foundation in reality.

    As for salary, I am not sure comparison of adjunct pay is reasonable to a full time employed individual, working approximately 250 days a year. The touted $20,000 is not a full time adjunct. The average US household makes $51,939.

    I would love to see kumquat to kumquat comparison just once.
    Last edited by jhp; 01-14-2016 at 10:21 AM. Reason: extra stuff

  5. #5
    Tim D is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    283
    Quote Originally Posted by StefanM View Post
    You are, of course, correct, but there are additional confounding factors.

    One glaring issue is that there is generally no price differentiation between classes taught by adjuncts and classes taught by full-time instructors or professors.

    It would make some sense to pay adjuncts less if the classes were at a lower tuition rate for students, but in reality, the students take the classes because they are required, and faculty are assigned based on other factors. It's definitely not a pure case of supply meeting demand.
    This is also shown during registration. If you have a professor who is popular their classes fill up first. If I end up with an adjunct, I am paying the same price as the popular professor. I end up with same degree paying the same amount even if all my courses were taught by adjuncts and no tenured faculty. The University is the one who benefits.

    Furthermore, higher ed is and has never been a truly free market.
    The Village Idiot

  6. #6
    Neuhaus is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Syracuse, NY
    Posts
    2,726
    For a long time I’ve been a believer that we should be seeking to shrink the number of programs that graduate so many terminal degree holders without the tenure track jobs to absorb them. Cutting off the supply of adjuncts should, in theory help the situation.
    But that buys into a distorted view of the labor of education, where status not only trumps work, but makes the academic underclass nearly invisible. This seems counter to the values of the university.
    This is where the author lost me. It isn't a distorted view of labor to consider that you should start cutting off the supply of adjuncts (I.e. Reduce the number of grad programs cranking them out) when there simply aren't enough jobs for the graduates.

    Right now, there are unemployed lawyers and lawyers forced into non legal work. There's a disconnect between academia and the industry it serves in that case. When it comes to adjuncts, the disconnect is not between academia and a separate industry but the industry of academia.

    A law school can lose its accreditation if bar pass rates fall below a certain threshold. But there is no comparable measure (or consequence) for other graduate programs. A school can crank out PhDs without a single one ever landing a tenure track position without a worry in the world.

    There are some PhD programs that, admittedly, aren't in the business of trying to mint professors (Union would be a good example of this) but there are simply many programs out there that do nothing but supply the demand for cheap labor by pouring more graduates into a saturated job market with diplomas bearing undistinguished names.

    I also suspect that if the school's relying heavily on adjuncts changed course tomorrow and replaced their adjunct pools with full time equivalents then there would still be complaining. Because the people who would now be without work would be lamenting that they couldn't even get a part time adjunct gig, however low the pay.

    The only way would probably be to try to reduce both the supply of adjuncts as well as the demand and hope, someday in the future, it would balance out to a lower level. What people seem to want is for schools to simply retain the same number of adjunct faculty and just pay them more. But that's unlikely. And the situation is likely to always be one where many get a little or a few get an adequate amount.
    M.B.A. University of Scranton (Anticipated 2019)
    M.S.M. (Project Management) University of Management and Technology
    B.S.O.L. Thomas Edison State University
    B.S.B.A. Colorado Technical University
    A.A. University of Scranton
    Certificate in Human Resources Management - Cornell University School of Industrial and Labor Relations
    Certified Employee Benefit Specialist (CEBS)
    Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR)

  7. #7
    Phdtobe is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    883
    Do adjuncts bring more to the classroom than tenures? I think they do. As an accountant , My preference is to be taught by a CFO who holds a full time jobs or even a retired CFO than being taught by a tenure who has never worked outside the classroom. The stuff in the textbooks I can figure out myself. It is the stories of real world experiences of the prof that excites.

  8. Advertisement

Similar Threads

  1. Problem with a university regarding refund..is there any solution..??..
    By shohag32 in forum Accreditation Discussions (RA, DETC, state approval, and unaccredited schools)
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 03-27-2009, 05:55 PM
  2. The obesity epidemic has a simple solution
    By Elecmac in forum Off-Topic Discussions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-09-2006, 05:08 PM
  3. Malaysia's Solution to Islamic Troubles
    By adamsmith in forum Off-Topic Discussions
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-01-2004, 08:50 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts




1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15