Participating in an unaccredited forum could damage one's credibility, or possibly become a time bomb waiting to explode. Which of the following best describes the future direction of DegreeInfo? DegreeInfo Should:
Currently, there is a three-way tie. Majority would have preferred Rich or Ken to be the accrediting or the validating authority but unfortunately their names are not in the check boxes.
Although the University of Liverpool would be helpful I think that accreditation by the University of Zimbabwe would be even more interesting. Chip could be replaced by Robert Mugabe. Mugabe could be dictator emeritus of the forum. Ahh I can see it now, if they don't shoot you (which considering the ethnic make up of the majority who voted on the nationality/ethnic poll is quite likely), your degreeinfo degree could be accepted and recognized in Harare (may have mispelled the capital) where a world of economic opportunity awaits. North
Re: Re: Should DegreeInfo Be Accredited? Perhaps Robert Mugabe could do a better job moderating this board than being the President of Zimbabwe. It's a shame. The guy has more degrees than anybody that currently posts here. Most of his degrees were earned by correspondence (DL).
Rather than accreditation, I believe they should seek certification. Most of the folks are certifiable
