Crazy New Policy In Higher Education

Discussion in 'Off-Topic Discussions' started by AV8R, Oct 6, 2004.

Loading...
  1. AV8R

    AV8R Active Member

    Benedict College in Columbia, S.C., enforces an academic policy that defies belief. Say I'm a freshman taking your class in biology. I learn little from your lectures, assigned readings and homework. I do attend class every day, take notes and manage to average 40 percent on the graded work for the semester. What grade might you give me? I'm betting that all but the academic elite would say, "Sorry, Williams, but no cigar," and I'd earn an F for the course. But if you're a professor at Benedict College and gave me that F, you'd be fired.

    That's exactly what happened to science professors Milwood Motley and Larry Williams, both of whom refused to go along with the college's Success Equals Effort (SEE) policy. SEE is a policy where 60 percent of a freshman's grade is based on effort and the rest on academic performance. In a student's sophomore year, the formula drops to 50-50, and it isn't used at all for junior and senior years. In defense of his policy, Benedict's president, Dr. David H. Swinton, said that the students "have to get an A in effort to guarantee that if they fail the subject matter, they can get the minimum passing grade. I don't think that's a bad thing."

    According to a story published by Columbia's The State newspaper (www.thestate.com, Aug. 20, 2004), Milwood Motley said the policy compromises the integrity of Benedict. Students are being passed to increase student retention by falsely boosting academic performance. When professors Motley and Williams assigned grades based upon academic performance, Motley said the administration "told us to go back and recalculate the grades, and I just refused to do it." At that point, Dr. Swinton fired both for insubordination.

    Dr. William Gunn, a faculty member for 40 years and president of Benedict College's chapter of the American Association of University Professors, is dead set against the policy and believes most other faculty are as well. Writing in The State (Sept. 22, 2004), Dr. Gunn says the SEE policy not only harms today's student but as well Benedict graduates who will see their degrees come under suspicion.

    Dr. Swinton's policy borders on lunacy. Imagine that a freshman gets an A for effort in his algebra class but has virtually no grasp of the material, earning him an F grade. Under the college's SEE policy, the student would be assigned a C for the course. What can we expect when the student takes Algebra II and later takes a course where algebra is a tool? He'll fall further and further behind because he hasn't grasped the material from the earlier courses. He'll graduate only if the fraudulent grading continues, and his job prospects will depend upon racial preferences.

    Here's my question to you: Can you think of a more effective way to discredit and cast doubt on the degrees of all students who graduate from Benedict? How would you like people to be certified in any activity that way -- your doctor, your tax accountant, your mechanic or anybody upon whom you depend for reliable proficient service? Whatever academic handicaps Benedict's students have when they enter -- their median SAT score is 803 -- are disguised and exacerbated by the school's SEE policy. As reported in The State, Harvard-educated Dr. Swinton admitted that he did not know of a policy like this at any other institution and said he would not use such a policy at a college with more stringent entrance criteria.

    The blame for this academic madness cannot wholly be placed at its president's feet. Benedict's Board of Trustees bears the blame for either enacting or tolerating this policy. Also culpable are those taxpayers and donors whose funds make it possible for this madness to continue.
     
  2. uncle janko

    uncle janko member

    Well, now. If Mr Motley is from an old Carolinian family he is likely one of my non-Carpathian relatives. He certainly has the temperament. Good for him and his colleague for standing up to this rank nonsense.
     
  3. nosborne48

    nosborne48 Well-Known Member

    I am not so sure it is POSSIBLE to put in great effort in Algebra and still manage to not learn it.

    I don't like the policy but I also don't know what practical effect it will really have.
     
  4. me again

    me again Well-Known Member

    The described policy sounds pretty weird, but...

    I looked at the college and it looks pretty good. Nice website too. It looks like they are going to begin offering graduate degrees as well. :)
     
  5. marilynd

    marilynd New Member

    At least one practical effect over time will be that their graduates will have problems getting into good graduate schools. It doesn't take long for word to spread to those involved in graduate admissions: "Oh . . . you're from THAT school."

    marilynd
     
  6. Megatron

    Megatron New Member

    That policy will breed

    A) Complacent Students
    B) Dumb Students
    C) A worthless degree
    D) All of the Above
    E) D only.

    Take your pick
     
  7. Jeff Walker

    Jeff Walker New Member

    This the heart of the matter. There are many private schools that are struggling financially to stay solvent. If Freshman enrollment is slipping, you try to compensate by getting more of your Freshman to come back as Sophomores.
     
  8. Jack Tracey

    Jack Tracey New Member

    Re: Re: Crazy New Policy In Higher Education

    This was the conclusion I reached as well. It's easy to see that within a few years the school will be full of slackers. The parents will gladly pay the tuition knowing that their kid wouldn't be able to earn a degree anywhere else. It's also probably true that the reputation of the school will be tarnished and that graduate schools will not view these degrees as equivalent to those of other schools. It may not matter though as the kids in that school don't want to get advanced degrees anyway.
    Jack
     

Share This Page