Al-Qaeda: Canada deserves bombing...

Well, here's what sitting on the sidelines may bring Canada:

"The Al-Qaeda terror network views Canada as a legitimate target because it is a "selfish" nation committing "terrorism" against Muslims around the world, an unofficial spokesman for jihadists waging holy war against the West said Friday."
More at:
http://www.canada.com/national/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=aed9d12f-689e-4725-b652-12d25afe4ebe

 

Canada deserves bombing from Al-Queda?

Newsflash: Any country that doesn't have a Muslim majority and/or doesn't pay tribute to the Islamo-Facists is a "legitimate target".

The only way to deal with those people is to kill them.

 

...and when Canada does finally get involved militarily in the war against terrorism, we can expect a full showing by their air, land, and sea forces - in other words, a flying squirrel, a mountie, and a canoe.

 

Actually, the canoe is not available. It sprang a leak last year during military games in Manitoba. As for the squirrel, flying squirrels are only found in southern states. Our squirrels can chew and spit peanuts. When, and if, Canada does get involved in an international conflict, be sure that you nuke Ottawa in the process!

 

Bruce,
You need to look at the crapy immigration policies that allow suspected Al-Queda members from entering Canada. As it stands now, just about anyone can enter Canada as a landed immigrant so long as you have a valid passport from your country. The morons who run this country have not addressed any of Canada's immigration issues since 9-11. If the Americans want to kill someone, please start with Canada's politicians.

 

Yes, they must be killed and tortured. Because we're so enlightened and stuff.

 

<<The only way to deal with those people is to kill them.>>

Unfortunately, I have to agree with this.

 

No, you find what matters to them and threaten that.

 

We have flying squirrels here - not common but there are some.

Canada's armed forces were 120,000 in the early cold war, 80,000 through the later cold war, and about 50,000 now. In that time our population doubled.

Half our massive fleet of 100 F-18s are mothballed, our ships are tied up in port with the crews retrained as infantry and sent to Afghanistan.

We have an impressive 120 thirty year old tanks and forty year old helicopters.

 

I didn't mention torture.

The United States didn't kill 3,000 people by flying airliners into skyscrapers a few years ago. The Islamo-Fascists started this fight, not the U.S.

If someone is hell-bent on killing you, the only way to deal with them is to kill them first. They leave you alone after that. It's not a difficult concept.

 

Michael Savage suggested targeting a Minuteman III nuclear ICBM on Mecca, and issuing a proclamation that one more act of terrorism would result in pushing the button.

 

Now that idea I like...

Hey Bruce,
I actually agree with you on that one....
- Carl

 

Re: Now that idea I like...

I didn't suggest it, so you're not agreeing with me.

It's really a moot point, since no one (in either party) in Washington D.C. has the testicular fortitude to actually do it.

 

<<Michael Savage suggested targeting a Minuteman III nuclear ICBM on Mecca, and issuing a proclamation that one more act of terrorism would result in pushing the button.>>

1) It wouldn't even have to be a nuke.
2) As much as this sounds like a good plan, it probably isn't. For starters, we would be declaring war against the millions of muslims that, at present, disgree with the radical nature of some. Secondly, Mecca is their holiest of sites. If we destroyed it they would, in very short order, consider it God's divine command to avenge its destruction. It would be considered a strike against God, not a strike against His people.

The only way you deal with the issue of terrorism is to destroy the terrorists and those that harbor them. This is exactly what we say we are doing, but we're really not. You can't win a war when only one side is expected to abide by rules. War is dirty, nasty, ruthless, heartless, cold-blooded and dehumanizing. Innocent people get killed. Until we stop pretending that it's anything other than this we can not (and will not) be successful. War is not pretty and it can't be won with surgical little strikes that only hurt "the bad guys." As grotesque as it may be, if we are going to fight the war then let's really fight the war. Start targeting entire cities without discrimination. Destroy men, women, children, livestock, etc. The immediate reaction of the muslim world would be to retaliate with great force, but it would be very short lived. When entire cities begin to disappear and the death toll numbers mount into 6 and 7 digits, spirits will break. It's how to win any long-term fight against a determined foe. You have to break their backs, then their spirit, and then their backs again. Gruesome? Ugly? Disgusting? Yes, but it really is the most efficient way to fight. My sons are 15 and 11. When it comes time to send them off to war, and I pray the time will never come, I would want to know we are fighting to win...no holding back...no trying to play by civilized rules in an uncivilized situation.

Pug

 

What is the goal of the terrorists? Determine what is that goal and deny them any hope of achieving it.

 

<<What is the goal of the terrorists? Determine what is that goal and deny them any hope of achieving it.>>

The goal of the terrorist is to convert the world to Islam and to destroy those that refuse conversion. There is only one way to deal with this type of radical mentality and ideology, and I have already outlined how to go about it.

Pug

 

Where did that come from? They want us out of the middle east. They want us to stop backing Israel. They want us to stop putting in puppet governments in oil producing muslim states.

 

<<Where did that come from? They want us out of the middle east. They want us to stop backing Israel. They want us to stop putting in puppet governments in oil producing muslim states.>>

You have obviously never studied Islam.

 

Anyone can come in to Canada except if they are a legitimate immigrant. It took my wife 2.5 years to get through the immigration process, despite the fact that her application was deemed to be of good quality. Meanwhile Immigration Canada claimed how it was making it easier for families to reunite. What a load of manure! Near the end I had to call on my M.P. (Stephen Owen, M.P.) to start making official inquiries, so as to send a signal that they were being watched. When my wife arrived she exclaimed "My God! It's just like Russia, excpept Canadians give you an official smile and nothing. You get nothing in Russia as well, and without the phony smile".

Earon

 

It was American morons who let in the WTC bombers. Our morons had nothing to do with it.

Why come through Canada when Americans are equally clueless?