+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 40
  1. #1
    blodgett is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Lincoln NE
    Posts
    7

    CUSGC faculty comments

    Greetings to all. I'm new on this discussion board. I've read different views and experiences that some of you have had with CUSGC. I have seen clear comments from at least two students at this institution, still referred to as MIGS. There have been a few faculty who have posted, including Dr. Bear. I'm not getting a clear picture of the current image of CUSGC today.

    I do not refer to this institution as MIGS since a letter was sent to faculty on Aug 6, 2001, stating that "public perception was that it was a "stand alone" institution (which it is not) and it was decided to drop the name Monterrey Institute in order to reflect the reality of its standing as a graduate division within the Center of University Studies." It is not unusual for there to be a subdivision within a university with a separate accounting system. MIGS is easier to say and shorter in my file structure, and CUSGC has an entirely different sound.

    I have read nothing on the CUSGC website that claims to be US accredited, but describes the international status of the accreditation. There is a statement that the degree is recognized by employers for pay raises and promotions. That's one reason why many adults go for a graduate degree, anyway, not for a future in the academy. The legitimacy of this was confirmed for me when Dean Chatfield and I worked with the state of Illinois to clarify if a Masters degree sought by one of my students would fulfill requirements for a promotion. After careful consideration, the response was affirmative and I have not received any notification that the Illinois decision has been recinded.

    I've long been of the opinion that the strength of the teacher is not the sole component for academic success in school. The student must bring the desire for a quality learning experience to the conversation. An excellent accredited school can produce a student who didn't learn principles of educational theory and a good school can produce a student with an excellent grasp of the concepts. You all know this. CUSGC's procedures of establishing a learning contract places the responsiblity in the lap of the student, but the faculty also must provide appropriate instruction. The syllabi that I provide my students are as rigorous as any that I experienced in my own graduate work. I can honestly say that the students that get past me will be competitive in the marketplace.

    I've been teaching with MIGS/CUSGC since March, 2001. I'd like to hear more from other faculty members. While I continue to work closely with my students, I agree with comments in other threads that the management may not be the tightest. What are other teaching experiences? What successes and disappointments have you experienced?

    Cynthia
    Cynthia Blodgett-McDeavitt

  2. #2
    Dan East is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Fort Fraser, BC Canada
    Posts
    39
    You wrote: "I'm not getting a clear picture of the current image of CUSGC today."

    When I first discovered CUSGC it was not referred to as MIGS on their website. I was impressed by the concept and promptly set about getting all registration papers in order and mailed the package to the Mexican address listed:

    official transcripts
    letters of recommendation
    a well thought out and executed bio (IMHO)
    AND a registration fee in US dollars

    THEN, I sat back and waited for my journey to a challenging RA degree to begin...

    only to discover DegreeInfo... and find out that MIGS was all a sham!
    Geez! No wonder the "university" never responded to my numerous emails!

    My questions to you are, where are you getting your students? They wouldn't take me!
    Can you use your position to get my money back, please?

    Oh yeah, the clear picture of CUSGC... sorry, I don't think profanity is allowed on this forum.

  3. #3
    Gus Sainz is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    1,738

    Angry

    Originally posted by Dan East
    Snip

    Oh yeah, the clear picture of CUSGC... sorry, I don't think profanity is allowed on this forum.
    If I were you, Dan, I'd show a little more respect towards the High Priestess of the Order of the Red Grail Church of Transformational Wicca.
    Gus Sainz
    DegreeDiscussion.com

  4. #4
    Rich Douglas is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    11,356
    Bad juju. Very bad juju.

    Anyone associated with MIGS who takes this stance is either naive or deceptive. Neither of these is particularly good in a faculty advisor.

    One post, and she's already piling it on about MIGS.

  5. #5
    Dan East is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Fort Fraser, BC Canada
    Posts
    39
    I just killed a chicken and danced in it's blood, so I think I'm ok. Thanks for asking!

  6. #6
    blodgett is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Lincoln NE
    Posts
    7
    Good Googling! This sort of sprightly welcome is very much like how the bright minds in Mensa-Texas interact.

    My questions reflect my observations of other land-based and distance institutions in comparison with CUSGC. I am interested in hearing the experiences of other faculty. That's why I started a new thread. I am, in fact, unable to reach anyone there. I do keep all correspondence so I can review which administrator said what when.

    Dancing in blood, though, now that's a peculiar comment from an educated person. Funny how you pick up on my religion and not my research. Oh well. I could say "I hear you're a Catholic priest. Does that mean you're a pedophile?" I'm sure that your religion does not cloud your judgment as my religion does not cloud mine. Religion is not a discussion that is appropriate for this forum.
    Cynthia Blodgett-McDeavitt

  7. #7
    tcnixon is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    California, USA
    Posts
    1,592
    Originally posted by blodgett


    Dancing in blood, though, now that's a peculiar comment from an educated person. Funny how you pick up on my religion and not my research. Oh well. I could say "I hear you're a Catholic priest. Does that mean you're a pedophile?" I'm sure that your religion does not cloud your judgment as my religion does not cloud mine. Religion is not a discussion that is appropriate for this forum.
    Agreed. A little religious tolerance is never a bad thing (particularly when she did not bring it to board, but someone had to track down her identity).

    Come on, folks. There's plenty to discuss concerning her post about CUSGC/MIGS without insulting her personally.



    Tom Nixon
    Author, Complete Guide to Online High Schools (2012)
    http://BestOnlineHighSchools.com

  8. Advertisement

  9. #8
    blodgett is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Lincoln NE
    Posts
    7
    Thank you, Tom. I'm sure that the persons who posted completely understand that distance education is just that, education at a distance. Students in their dl classes may be from anywhere in the world. International etiquette is particularly necessary in this business. One student that I have in another school is a professional man in the Middle East. I certainly cannot interact with him in the same manner that I do a college freshman in West Virginia. There are differences in use of language and culture, including expectations of teachers .

    Distance education teachers need to be completely inclusive with interactions online. Jokes about gender, disability or ethnicity, and slashing comments on faith, only serve to silence students and, in fact, lose business for the school as they go elsewhere to more inclusive academic environments.

    As I said before, I hope to hear from *faculty* about what they experience with CUSGC. This forum is an excellent place to discuss the issues and practice appropriate international etiquette at the same time. Who knows, a potential contract or new student may be on board and will make decisions based on the strength or lack of academic presence.

    Again, any other faculty out there?
    Cynthia Blodgett-McDeavitt

  10. #9
    Rich Douglas is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    11,356
    MIGS used to have a discussion board, but no one ever really used it. You mean you folks don't have staff meetings?

  11. #10
    levicoff Guest
    Perhaps Ms. Blodgett is not invited to attend . . . since her name does not appear on MIGS faculty list. Unusual, since she claims to be teaching for them since March 2001.

    (Do pardon my reference, Cynthia, but they have such a special place in my heart that they will always be MIGS.) :D

    Perhaps, then, she would like to share with us how she came to "teach" at CEU/MIGS - whether she responded to an ad or whether they approached her. As well as whether she has personally met anyone associated with CEU. (As Marlon Brando said in Guys & Dolls, "And that means in person.") And how many students she has advised, and in what capacity. And whether she knows of any degrees being awarded by her illustrious and august institution. And what her faculty advisors at U. Nebraska might think of her distinguished affiliation. (No, that is not a threat by any means, merely a rhetorical question in light of Dr. Arias' recent experience with Cal State.)

    In the meantime, if she has not done so, I suggest that Ms. Blodgett set her index here on the board to reflect messages beyond the usual 45 days. I'm sure she would find the more complete threads in the MIGS forum quite illuminating, and it would be interesting to see if she would continue to write such an enthusiastic apologia.

    By the way, welcome to the board, Cynthia.

  12. #11
    Gus Sainz is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    1,738

    Talking Faculty?

    “Faculty? We ain't got no faculty. We don't need no faculty. I don't have to show you any stinking faculty!"



    Alfonso Bedoya,
    President of CUSGC
    Gus Sainz
    DegreeDiscussion.com

  13. #12
    Dan East is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Fort Fraser, BC Canada
    Posts
    39
    Cynthia:

    Actually, my spiritual beliefs DO cloud my judgement, as they form part of my perceptual set, and as such, are not easily compartmentalized.

    However, you are right. Religious discussions are not proper grist for this mill. As for the dancing in blood bit, well, I found the "bad Juju" line so funny, I busted a gut! I simply had to respond in kind! No offense meant, I assure you!

    Additionally, since I am not "faculty" anywhere, I'll refrain henceforth from interacting on this thread...after throwing salt over my left shoulder!

    Good luck with MIGS.

  14. #13
    Dan East is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Fort Fraser, BC Canada
    Posts
    39
    I am Canadian, therefore, I apologize! Disregard the "salt over the shoulder" tag, ok?

  15. #14
    blodgett is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Lincoln NE
    Posts
    7
    levicoff: I have the counter set back to the beginning and I have read the posts. What I saw was post after post of rehashing the same commentary. I did notice that John Bear said at one time that MIGS, as it was called then, seemed to be legit with bad marketing and pr. I concur.

    It's clear that Rich has been greatly hurt by the situation. Everything that he described, though, is not unique to a dl institution. Doctoral students tend to be targets of university staff and professors who think it is their duty to make life as miserable for students as it was for them. I've known secretaries who deliberately withhold information from doc students (like call numbers for registration). I've known professors who deliberately do not follow through with academic responsibilities toward doc students. I know one PhD who had her data stolen by faculty who proceeded to publish her dissertation study under their names. There was nothing she could do. I know another PhD whose wife ran off with his committee chair and his dissertation grant. Mistreatment of doc students is not unique, Rich, nor limited to cyber.

    In my recent past I worked with a .edu internet startup and there's all sorts of ways to mess up on the paperwork. I'm holding my judgment until I talk with Bruce Forman or Jon Chatfield.

    By the way, I'm assuming that since you know all, do you know where Linda Yates might be found?

    Yes, I've talked with Bruce, Jon, and Linda, voice to voice. No, I did not go to Florida or Mexico. I don't know of many truly distance teachers who actually set foot in the administrative offices. Not a bad idea, though. I don't need to respond to your crude suggestion that I'm lying about mentoring students. If I were lying, I'd have to have a pretty rank ego to put myself into your precision line of fire. I assume I am not on that fac list because I have not yet completed my dissertation.

    Gus: Funny picture. Not one you'd like to have on your bumper in Texas. Texans are allowed to carry concealed weapons, you know.

    Dan: I wouldn't say that spiritual beliefs cloud judgment, but they do offer a lens through which you interpret your experiences. If your spiritual truth is that authority is condemning, then distrust may very well be what you will experience in your relations with authority in any setting. (Bad juju if you bring that attitude home to your spouse.) If your spiritual beliefs hold that people are basically good, then your actions will tend to listen to others with open ears and maybe an open mind. Gandhi wasn't clouded and he lived firmly with his spirituality.

    Feel free to do the salt thing. That's an old folk superstition. I suppose you can look up the origin of the practice on farmersalmanac.com. Don't use too much salt, though. Some is ok but too much will damage the flowerbeds. You could toss coffee grinds over your shoulder if you're in a violet patch.

    Oh, thanks for the welcome. It's nice to see that you didn't treat me any differently than Julie or Leslie. I see that it's just a few men who have the loud angry voices in this discussion. I wonder why that is.
    Cynthia Blodgett-McDeavitt

  16. Advertisement

  17. #15
    Bill Highsmith is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    650
    Originally posted by blodgett
    levicoff: I have the counter set back to the beginning and I have read the posts. What I saw was post after post of rehashing the same commentary. I did notice that John Bear said at one time that MIGS, as it was called then, seemed to be legit with bad marketing and pr. I concur.

    It's clear that Rich has been greatly hurt by the situation. Everything that he described, though, is not unique to a dl institution.....
    Very funny synopsis. The black plague was inconvenient, too.

  18. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    1,715
    I liked Gus's picture of his alter ego. But I think perhaps this is the real Gus: Sainz in action.
    (Thanks to Gus himself for providing the link.)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts




1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15