+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Chip is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    2,316

    Post The "new" MIGS board ... NOT!

    Has anyone noticed the makeup of the "new" MIGS board? It's the old board minus Sheila and Bill Danzig (in other words, Enrique and Josh, sheila's attorney) plus two of the former "honorary trustees" that are/were supposedly only figureheads, plus some new CEU guy who is supposedly the distance learning person.

    Either it's another PR scam, such as Sheila's continuing to run her research paper business but putting it in someone else's name (in this case, her web designer), or else CEU is FINALLY getting a clue and forcing the Danzigs to move aside.

    And, as Steve pointed out, the fact that Sheila and Bill weren't replaced indicates that either they were, um, encouraged to leave, or that they're off in appearance only.


    *If* it's real (and we all know, given Sheila's history of being less-than-honest a lot of the time, it may not be), then it is a genuinely wonderful step for MIGS. And so I will watch carefully ... but skeptically.



  2. #2
    BW
    BW is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Eastern TN
    Posts
    7

    Cool

    I saw it. For a moment I thought I recognized some as members of the Fuentes Cartel, but I was mistaken.

  3. #3
    Peter French is offline member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    586

    Post

    Originally posted by Chip:
    Has anyone noticed the makeup of the "new" MIGS board? It's the old board minus Sheila and Bill Danzig (in other words, Enrique and Josh, sheila's attorney) plus two of the former "honorary trustees" that are/were supposedly only figureheads, plus some new CEU guy who is supposedly the distance learning person.

    Either it's another PR scam, such as Sheila's continuing to run her research paper business but putting it in someone else's name (in this case, her web designer), or else CEU is FINALLY getting a clue and forcing the Danzigs to move aside.

    And, as Steve pointed out, the fact that Sheila and Bill weren't replaced indicates that either they were, um, encouraged to leave, or that they're off in appearance only.


    *If* it's real (and we all know, given Sheila's history of being less-than-honest a lot of the time, it may not be), then it is a genuinely wonderful step for MIGS. And so I will watch carefully ... but skeptically.


    The original appointments of Sheila and Bill was only ever for the first 12 months. This period has now expired, and as far as I understand cooincides with the Levicoff saga, rather than arises because of it.

    Incidentally, I have pulled out as a PhD candidate there primarily because what would normally and reasonably be expected as processes and procedures pertant to higher education , were not evident - for example I drafted the handbook for faculty in late 1999, but it wasn't released until late 2000, and was such, as a result of 'changes', that it created a lot of problems. This seemed typical of how MIGS operated. Add to that the dubious value of a mexican degree :-)) and appointment as National GM to a major IT educator, and I didn't need MIGS.


    There are clearly better alternatives, and i still have 2 PhD openings fuilly paid for with my alma mater - such is the luck of being an Australian.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts




1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197