+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Kizmet is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    between the devil and the deep blue sea
    Posts
    15,142

    The Shanghai Index

    Truly rigorous university rankings

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/willard.../#a8b716c575a5
    American College of Sports Medicine

  2. #2
    sanantone is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    2,448
    This article is so stupid. Looking at the ranking criteria, I knew the rankings would be largely the same and they are.
    Texas State University - PhD CJ (ABD)
    Angelo State University - Master of Security Studies and Grad Cert Terrorism
    Thomas Edison State College/University - BA Soc Sci, AAS in Environmental Safety, ASNSM in Biology, & BSBA in CIS

  3. #3
    Kizmet is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    between the devil and the deep blue sea
    Posts
    15,142
    Hyperbolic headlines?!? FAKE NEWS!!!
    American College of Sports Medicine

  4. #4
    heirophant is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    609
    I like the Shanghai rankings a lot more than US News. But that's not saying much.

    Giving 30% weight to Nobel prizes and Fields medals will kind of select out the 'usual suspect' universities. 20% weight to publications in Nature and Science probably gives undue weight to those two publications. 40% to the citation indices helps balance that, but ends up giving 60% weight to citations.

    So again, the Shanghai rankings don't seem to even address quality of taught classroom education . The rankings are all about research productivity and impact. I'd suggest that high impact research probably does correlate pretty well with educational quality at the doctoral/research level, but it's still a very indirect measure.

    And obviously, these criteria emphasize math and natural science almost exclusively. Without those subjects, you lose 50% of what is being weighed (Nobels, Fields medals, Nature and Science.) And I'd guess that the citation rankings (another 40%) are science-centric too.

    So if a university isn't a scientific research institution, it's gong to fall very far down these particular rankings.

    That's why, once again, I favor subject-specific rankings. The only one I'm familliar with is the Philosophical Gourmet Report. (Which polls prominent philosophers about perceived faculty strength at other universities.) Even this one indirectly favors research productivity over classroom teaching , but it gives prospective doctoral students a much better picture of which universities are strong in which research areas.

Similar Threads

  1. NYU in Shanghai
    By Kizmet in forum General Distance Learning Discussions
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-17-2016, 06:44 PM
  2. http://www.ashwooduniversity.net/index.htm
    By dlady in forum Accreditation Discussions (RA, DETC, state approval, and unaccredited schools)
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 04-03-2006, 12:36 PM
  3. Online Periodicals Index????????????
    By GUNSMOKE in forum General Distance Learning Discussions
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-27-2005, 04:29 PM
  4. Shill Longevity Index
    By John Bear in forum Off-Topic Discussions
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 04-27-2004, 10:46 PM
  5. University Index Sites
    By Jack Tracey in forum General Distance Learning Discussions
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-31-2002, 08:24 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts




1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15