The Gates Effect

Discussion in 'General Distance Learning Discussions' started by Kizmet, Jan 18, 2016.

Loading...
  1. Kizmet

    Kizmet Moderator

  2. jumbodog

    jumbodog New Member

    This once would have been considered indentured servitude because it is indentured servitude.

    Everything old is new again.
     
  3. SteveFoerster

    SteveFoerster Resident Gadfly Staff Member

    It's not indentured servitude, since no one is forced to do anything. It's a better example of regulatory capture.
     
  4. jumbodog

    jumbodog New Member

    Of course it is indentured servitude.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indentured_servant

    No one was forced to go to the New World either.

    I don't know where this mania for choice is coming from. Indentured servitude--just like student debt--is and was a problem not because there wasn't a "free choice" but because the power inequalities upon which the system was built. The poor had a choice but it was a choice between rigged systems.

    Edit: Yes, you are correct now that I think about it. It is an example of regulatory capture also. It's both. But the morally pernicious part is the indentured servitude while regulatory capture only implies a moral hazard.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 18, 2016
  5. jhp

    jhp Member

    The Foundation spends large amounts in foreign elections and politics. It is not just a humanitarian organization.
     

Share This Page