Textbook Spyder: what a fine thing for those who buy textbooks

Discussion in 'General Distance Learning Discussions' started by John Bear, Nov 16, 2015.

Loading...
  1. John Bear

    John Bear Senior Member

    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 16, 2015
  2. Rich Douglas

    Rich Douglas Well-Known Member

    A fine thing. Textbooks sales can be a racket. The Chronicle of Higher Education recently ran an article about a professor who decided not to assign a text co-written by his department chair, one that had been in use for a very long time. (The alternates he assigned were cheaper; one was free.) His university admonished him formally, saying he went against university policy by not assigning that book.

    Anything that will save students on texts is a good thing, IMHO.
     
  3. Neuhaus

    Neuhaus Well-Known Member

    I came across this article that says that the authors typically only receive about $0.12 on every dollar spent on textbooks. The rest goes to textbook publishers.

    Seems a lot of money could be saved if the authors self-published. The major issue there would be the fact that professors would probably work ever harder to peddle their wares upon unsuspecting students. Still, it seems like a pretty obvious thing to police. Just don't let them assign their own text books as required reading. If I am paying tens of thousands for my kid to attend a school, that tuition should pay for access to the professor's wisdom without buying his/her text.

    I've had professors who, I felt, were interesting. So, I bought their book without being forced sometimes years after the class had ended. And professors routinely assign texts authored by other professors even though they don't get a cut of the action.
     

Share This Page