+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 56
  1. #1
    EsqPhD is offline member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    120

    Post A Beginning Trend: Multiple Doctorates

    It seems like the academic and professional bars keep going up. I encounter more people with multiple doctorates these days than say 20 years ago. Is this a reasonable trend? Is there a point where society says enough with overqualification?

  2. #2
    Chip is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    2,290

    Post

    I vaguely remember John or somebody mentioning that there was at one point, the mention of the "Chancelorette" degree or some such, that was to be the degree-to-end-all-degrees that one gets after earning a doctorate.

    The question in my mind is, do people do multiple doctorates because they feel they need them for work or profession, because they are perpetual students and want to avoid the "real world", because they are insecure and feel like they need the education , or for yet another reason?

  3. #3
    Tom Head is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    2,015

    Post

    Originally posted by Chip:
    I vaguely remember John or somebody mentioning that there was at one point, the mention of the "Chancelorette" degree or some such, that was to be the degree-to-end-all-degrees that one gets after earning a doctorate.

    The question in my mind is, do people do multiple doctorates because they feel they need them for work or profession, because they are perpetual students and want to avoid the "real world", because they are insecure and feel like they need the education, or for yet another reason?
    Well...

    The best case for a double-doctorate I've ever seen is Stacey Ake of Metanexus. In 1994, she earned a Ph.D. in molecular biology. She found herself drawn to the philosophies of religion and science, so in 1999 she chased it with a Ph.D. in philosophy from Penn State and she is now an authority (quite naturally) in the interdisciplinary field of religion-and-science. I will not be overwhelmingly surprised if, at some point within the next ten years, she decides to add on a third doctorate, in theology.

    So I can think of a number of cases where a "doctoral cocktail" might be beneficial. For my part, I've always kind of mulled on the idea of earning a Th.D. after I earn my Ph.D., assuming I earn my Ph.D. in a field other than theology (which is actually how things look at this point). So I guess someone might earn a second doctorate for the same reason they might have earned the first one: because it looked like a good idea at the time.


    Peace,

    ------------------
    Tom Head
    www.tomhead.net
    [url=http://www.tomhead.net]Tom Head[/url]
    B.A. (Liberal Arts) '96 / Excelsior College (USNY/Regents)
    M.A. (Humanities) '00 / California State University, Dominguez Hills
    Ph.D. student (Philosophy of Religion/Interdisciplinary Studies) / Edith Cowan University, Australia

  4. #4
    Guest

    Post

    Two observations. The first is that I have often seen this with individuals whose first doctorate is a professional doctorate. They want the Ph.D or Th.D.

    The second is that we do have degree inflation. We discussed that in my undergraduate sociology course in the 80's. I have seen this in the work place as well. One of the factors making the market better for Ph.D's is the fact that (according to US News) industry is recognizing the ability of Ph.D.'s to fit in outside of academia. They are becoming prized for fortitude and analytical ability. This makes it safer to go on and get a doctorate (or two). My brother in law got his M.S. in Criminology and is looking for a Ph.D. program.

    North

    Originally posted by EsqPhD:
    It seems like the academic and professional bars keep going up. I encounter more people with multiple doctorates these days than say 20 years ago. Is this a reasonable trend? Is there a point where society says enough with overqualification?

  5. #5
    John Bear is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Northern California.
    Posts
    5,630

    Post

    It is the University of Chicago that proposed, and still hasn't let go of, the notion of a degree higher than the doctorate.

    And at a much lower level . . . I had dinner this evening with the director of graduate admissions of Golden Gate University. He said that high school grade inflation is a real issue for people like him. Many (but not all) US high schools are now giving grades as high as 5.0 (and even a few at 6.0) on a four point scale! So the formerly perfect 4.0 straight-A average is now not even high enough to be seriously considered, when most applicants have between 4.5 and 5.0 (on that 4-point scale). What (dare I say) nonsense.
    Author/co-author:15 editions of Bears Guide to Earning Degrees by Distance Learning,
    Degree Mills: the billion-dollar industry that has sold more than a million fake diplomas
    Not Your Mother's Cookbook: unusual recipes for adventurous books, 30+ more.
    www.johnbear.info

  6. #6
    Lewchuk is offline member
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Posts
    446

    Post

    I knew of a fellow with both a doctorate in Accounting and a doctorate in Philosophy, his specialty... business ethics !

    Originally posted by Tom Head:
    Well...

    The best case for a double-doctorate I've ever seen is Stacey Ake of Metanexus. In 1994, she earned a Ph.D. in molecular biology. She found herself drawn to the philosophies of religion and science, so in 1999 she chased it with a Ph.D. in philosophy from Penn State and she is now an authority (quite naturally) in the interdisciplinary field of religion-and-science. I will not be overwhelmingly surprised if, at some point within the next ten years, she decides to add on a third doctorate, in theology.

    So I can think of a number of cases where a "doctoral cocktail" might be beneficial. For my part, I've always kind of mulled on the idea of earning a Th.D. after I earn my Ph.D., assuming I earn my Ph.D. in a field other than theology (which is actually how things look at this point). So I guess someone might earn a second doctorate for the same reason they might have earned the first one: because it looked like a good idea at the time.


    Peace,


  7. #7
    Guest

    Post

    Originally posted by John Bear:
    [b]Many (but not all) US high schools are now giving grades as high as 5.0 (and even a few at 6.0) [b]on a four point scale!
    If this logic is used in college/grad school settings, then I guess one could theoretically graduate from a four-year program with such a high GPA, they would immediately be awarded a doctorate! Complete a four-year program with a 6.0 GPA, and earn the BA, MA, Ph.D. all at once.

    I wish I had thought of this first, but alas, Northwestern International University, Ltd., has been doing this for some time---the only difference is that one can do it there in six months.

    Russell

  8. Advertisement

  9. #8
    EsqPhD is offline member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    120

    Post

    What do you think of this? In Germany, each doctorate brings a title on its own--so, if you have two doctorates, you can be called "Dr. Dr. Schweitzer." Think that the rest of the world will ever follow?

  10. #9
    BillDayson is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    California, USA
    Posts
    5,688

    Post

    Originally posted by EsqPhD:
    It seems like the academic and professional bars keep going up. I encounter more people with multiple doctorates these days than say 20 years ago. Is this a reasonable trend? Is there a point where society says enough with overqualification?
    People change careers much more commonly today than they once did. I expect that many cases of multiple doctorates are associated with that. The English lit doctor that can't find a teaching post, seizes a business opportunity out of necessity, and fifteen years later is a DBA.

    As North points out, another possibility might be a combination of a practitioner-oriented and a research-oriented doctorate (a Pharm.D. with a Ph.D. in pharmacology, perhaps). M.D.'s often do Ph.D. dissertations in biomedical sciences. There are many dual degree programs that allow that.

    But all in all, I'd be far more impressed by a person with one garden-variety doctorate plus accomplishments than by somebody with multiple doctorates and no accomplishments. One's resume starts to speak louder than one's degrees at some point in a career.

    A doctorate means that one is expected to be able to do original work. Two doctorates don't make that work any more important.


  11. #10
    Dan Snelson is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Diamond Bar, Ca. USA
    Posts
    182

    Post

    So if you earn 2 PhD's do you get to put Dr. in front and PhD at the back????

    Dr. Joe Ray Billy Bob, PhD


  12. #11
    Guest

    Post

    The one that cracked me up was the one listed in Walston's Guide (may have come from Bear's first) that was a Bishop with everything inclduing Civil service rank thrown in. Zeesh!

    One of the differences between the US and Canada is the listing of degrees after one's name. We (Canada) list all degrees.
    eg. John Yurchuck, B.A., M.A., Ph.D.
    At the University level, not uncommon to see fellowships thrown in. I guess it is kind of a self affirming thing. It says "I am somebody".

    North

    Originally posted by Dan Snelson:
    So if you earn 2 PhD's do you get to put Dr. in front and PhD at the back????

    Dr. Joe Ray Billy Bob, PhD


  13. #12
    Bill Highsmith is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    650

    Post

    Originally posted by Tom Head:
    Well...
    ...For my part, I've always kind of mulled on the idea of earning a Th.D. after I earn my Ph.D....
    A new protocol is needed. In your example, a P/TH.D might do. For serial Ph.D.ers, perhaps Ph.3D. would be a hat-trick Ph.D. An M/Ph.D. would be a medical and academic doctor. Perhaps other information could be embedded. A B->Ph.D would be someone who skipped the master degree. Ph. would be a Doctor of comedy.


  14. #13
    EsqPhD is offline member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    120

    Post

    Originally posted by North:

    One of the differences between the US and Canada is the listing of degrees after one's name. We (Canada) list all degrees.
    eg. John Yurchuck, B.A., M.A., Ph.D.
    At the University level, not uncommon to see fellowships thrown in. I guess it is kind of a self affirming thing. It says "I am somebody".

    North

    I studied up at the University of Alberta (Edmonton, AB) for a few years--always wondered why some Canadian professionals include all their lower degrees also when listing academic credentials.

    One of my New Testament professor (at another school in Edmonton) told me it was proper for Ph.D.'s (but not M.D.'s) to write their names as "Dr. John Canada, Ph.D."--but by American etiquette, only the Ph.D. should go behind or the Dr. before--but not both. Can anyone confirm if the Dr. John Canada, Ph.D. is really permissible in Canada and/or England (it might be England also since this professor studied at the University of Manchester under F. F. Bruce).

    A trivia question--I'm pretty sure this applies not only to America--but also to England and Canada also. Assume all doctoral degrees only. If one earned an M.D. in 1980, a Ph.D. (in Theology) in 1984, and a J.D. in 1988, what is the most proper order for listing those credentials behind one's name?

    EsqPhD

  15. #14
    ahchem is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Modesto, CA U.S.A.
    Posts
    56

    Post

    Originally posted by EsqPhD:
    A trivia question--I'm pretty sure this applies not only to America--but also to England and Canada also. Assume all doctoral degrees only. If one earned an M.D. in 1980, a Ph.D. (in Theology) in 1984, and a J.D. in 1988, what is the most proper order for listing those credentials behind one's name?

    EsqPhD
    Interesting question...

    I would think something like:
    Over Achiever, M.D., J.D., Ph.D
    Because the first two are professional degrees, and technically the Ph.D. would be slightly higher on the academic snob scale.

    But the question that comes to my mind upon thinking about this: why would one have all these degrees? What do they have in common that they could be used together?

    There is some precedent for medical doctors become lawyers to work on medical law/malpractice. But I have no clue how a Ph.D. in theology would fit into that mix.

    Jeff Welch


  16. Advertisement

  17. #15
    Caballero Lacaye is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Kendall, Florida, U.S.A. and Central America
    Posts
    291

    Post

    Originally posted by North:


    (snip)

    One of the differences between the US and Canada is the listing of degrees after one's name. We (Canada) list all degrees.
    eg. John Yurchuck, B.A., M.A., Ph.D.
    At the University level, not uncommon to see fellowships thrown in. I guess it is kind of a self affirming thing. It says "I am somebody".

    North


    Hello again, North!

    North, this is the first time I am hearing of this. In my experience with Latin America and some parts of Europe, teachers always (or most of the time) disclose all academic credentials, from associates (titulados) to doctorates (doctorados). So, in the United States, if someone hypotetically earns an unacredited (or DETC/California accredited) bachelor and master, and then this same person earns a regionally-accredited PhD, I guess this person doesn't need to disclose his/her other lower degrees if he/she chooses to do so. Am I right?

    Take care,


    Karlos Alberto Lacaye
    caballerolacaye@newsmail.org

  18. #16
    David Williams is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    305

    Post

    I work in a teaching hospital where I have frequent, daily actually, contact with resident physicians. What I see more and more often is those people who have an eye on going into medical education taking an MD-PhD combination. For example, someone who wants to have a specialty in oncology will take a PhD in cell biology. There is even a nickname for these types: mudfudd. You also see a parallel for veterinarians who plan on entering the world of academia. Some medical schools, the University of Illinois for example, have arrangements for aspiring mudfudds. U. of I. students are directed toward the Champaign-Urbana campus. I am also familiar with some clinical psychology programs that partner with JD and MBA departments. It does seem as if the bar keeps rising for entry into academia.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts




1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15