Greetings! In a recent thread I asked for comments about Touro and NCU. I submitted applications to both for the Ph.D. Business Administration program. While I have not received a decision from NCU, I did receive notice today that I have been accepted into the Touro program. I thought it was very good of the Ph.D. director to personally call with that information. She's quite a pleasant professional (Cornell Grad). I was told that just "a handful" of applicants were accepted. I believe the next term commences in April. That gives me some time to get a few things in order. My thanks to those who addressed my questions in the other threads.
Not So Easy After All... Now that I have heard from NCU as well, I have to decide on which program to enter. Here are a couple thoughts for which I am soliciting feedback? 1. Does anyone find it odd that a university would say to a student, "Your acceptance is valid for 30-days"? I've never quite had that experience before. Makes me feel like I'm dealing with a telemarketer. (No offense to those in that um "noble" profession). That was a statement in the NCU letter of acceptance. 2. NCU requires 51 credits, having accepted 30 credits from previous graduate work. That puts the direct cost of the degree at somewhere about $25,000. By contrast, Touro has accepted me but in my conversation, I failed to ask if I would have to take any of the 20-credit hours of "Preparatory Courses". Each one would be an additional $2,000. So, coursework at Touro will be at minimum $22,000 plus an additional $6k-$8k for dissertation ($1500 per term). Given the additional cost of Touro, what would you see as the clear advantage it has over NCU? 3. For those attending NCU, I get the impression that each class requires "a textbook." I find this rather interesting as well since my MPA often required 3-4 texts per class. Any thoughts on this as well? Thanks for your responses.
Given Touro's uncertain accreditation status with WASC, I think I would go with NCU. Things may turn out OK for Touro but why take the chance? Touro had problems with Middle States with their doctoral programs and WASC has a much tougher reputation.
Potential Problem with Accreditors? In my conversation with Touro, they said they have resolved the accreditation issue. Are you or others aware of any ongoing issue? Is there still a possibility that the school could face some problems yet?
A lot of Touro alumni work as full time faculties in many schools. I saw a list here on the board yesterday.
Re: Not So Easy After All... Since you have an MBA, you won't have to take any prep courses: "General Preparatory Courses - 16 Credits (for students with Master's degree in non-business fields only)" from http://www.tourou.edu/cba/phd.htm under "Degree Requirements" However, myself and most of my peers are taking much longer than 4-5 terms to complete our dissertations. I think 8-10 terms is more realistic. So, you're probably looking at an investment of $34-37K for your PhD. ALL of TUI's resources are online. You aren't required to purchase ANY textbooks. That'll save you some money. Gary
Much tougher WASC and much tougher TUI doctoral program. In my view, TUI shaped up to become a serious and formidable research institute. Eli
Maybe I missed something but I don't see Touro listed as a WASC accredited school on the WASC website.
That's because Touro is NOT accredited by WASC. It's accredited by Middle States as a branch campus of Touro College (New York).
Yes, but a few months ago Middle States informed Touro they would not continue the accreditation beyond, if I recall, June of this year since Touro International was based somewhere in California.
This is normal No, this is common practice at most schools. If you have more people apply than are accepted you have to ensure you allow time to go to the wait list if some people decline to enroll.
