Does anyone have a leaning toward tuition per semester vs. class/unit? Most institutions are locked into one or the other. My last experience was per unit, and it worked out great. Anyone thought they were going to get their doctorate in two years, opted for a school with semester tuition, then regretted it because it took longer than expected? Is tuition per class always preferable if one is going to take the standards three/four years for the doctorate? Thanks for the feedback!
This is probably the main beef I have with Capella, which (in the School of Business) charges a flat rate per quarter, no matter how many classes you take. Of course, I recognize that if I didn't work full-time, I could easily take three classes a quarter, and possibly four. In that case, I would certainly benefit from the tuition per quarter scheme, and I'm sure would appreciate it! However, I prefer a tuition based on credit hour system -- this just seems more equitable to me. Cheers, Adrienne
the question you are asking is why I enrolled at NCU. I agree with Adrienne that the per credit is more equitable for us DL folks who have a family, job, etc... that doesn't allow for full-time study. As for taking your time. Well, NCU recently went to a 3 semester per year system to meet requirements for Federal loans, etc... So it is possible to take only three classes (1 per semester) a year and maintain enrollment. While this means taking a long time to complete the PhD it makes it more affordable. Good luck on your studies.